Abstract
Reproducibility is a key challenge of synthetic biology, but the foundation of reproducibility is only as solid as the reference materials it is built upon. Here we focus on the reproducibility of fluorescence measurements from bacteria transformed with engineered genetic constructs. This comparative analysis comprises three large interlaboratory studies using flow cytometry and plate readers, identical genetic constructs, and compatible unit calibration protocols. Across all three studies, we find similarly high precision in the calibrants used for plate readers. We also find that fluorescence measurements agree closely across the flow cytometry results and two years of plate reader results, with an average standard deviation of 1.52-fold, while the third year of plate reader results are consistently shifted by more than an order of magnitude, with an average shift of 28.9-fold. Analyzing possible sources of error indicates this shift is due to incorrect preparation of the fluorescein calibrant. These findings suggest that measuring fluorescence from engineered constructs is highly reproducible, but also that there is a critical need for access to quality controlled fluorescent calibrants for plate readers.
Funder
National Science Foundation
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference18 articles.
1. The second wave of synthetic biology: from modules to systems;PE Purnick;Nature reviews Molecular cell biology,2009
2. Five hard truths for synthetic biology;R Kwok;Nature,2010
3. Synthetic biology: an emerging engineering discipline;AA Cheng;Annual review of biomedical engineering,2012
4. Time to get serious about measurement in synthetic biology;J Beal;Trends in Biotechnology,2018
5. Measuring the activity of BioBrick promoters using an in vivo reference standard;JR Kelly;Journal of Biological Engineering,2009
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献