Consensus based framework for digital mobility monitoring

Author:

Kluge FelixORCID,Del Din Silvia,Cereatti Andrea,Gaßner Heiko,Hansen Clint,Helbostad Jorunn L.,Klucken Jochen,Küderle Arne,Müller Arne,Rochester Lynn,Ullrich MartinORCID,Eskofier Bjoern M.,Mazzà Claudia,

Abstract

Digital mobility assessment using wearable sensor systems has the potential to capture walking performance in a patient’s natural environment. It enables monitoring of health status and disease progression and evaluation of interventions in real-world situations. In contrast to laboratory settings, real-world walking occurs in non-conventional environments and under unconstrained and uncontrolled conditions. Despite the general understanding, there is a lack of agreed definitions about what constitutes real-world walking, impeding the comparison and interpretation of the acquired data across systems and studies. The goal of this study was to obtain expert-based consensus on specific aspects of real-world walking and to provide respective definitions in a common terminological framework. An adapted Delphi method was used to obtain agreed definitions related to real-world walking. In an online survey, 162 participants from a panel of academic, clinical and industrial experts with experience in the field of gait analysis were asked for agreement on previously specified definitions. Descriptive statistics was used to evaluate whether consent (> 75% agreement as defined a priori) was reached. Of 162 experts invited to participate, 51 completed all rounds (31.5% response rate). We obtained consensus on all definitions (“Walking” > 90%, “Purposeful” > 75%, “Real-world” > 90%, “Walking bout” > 80%, “Walking speed” > 75%, “Turning” > 90% agreement) after two rounds. The identification of a consented set of real-world walking definitions has important implications for the development of assessment and analysis protocols, as well as for the reporting and comparison of digital mobility outcomes across studies and systems. The definitions will serve as a common framework for implementing digital and mobile technologies for gait assessment and are an important link for the transition from supervised to unsupervised gait assessment.

Funder

Innovative Medicines Initiative

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

NIHR Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre

National Institute for Health Research

Novartis

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference54 articles.

1. Recovery From Hip Fracture in Eight Areas of Function;J Magaziner;The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences,2000

2. Wearable sensors objectively measure gait parameters in Parkinson’s disease;JCM Schlachetzki;PLOS ONE,2017

3. Gait speed as a measure of functional status in COPD patients;C Karpman;International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease,2014

4. Body-worn motion sensors detect balance and gait deficits in people with multiple sclerosis who have normal walking speed;RI Spain;Gait & Posture,2012

5. Gait and balance impairment in early multiple sclerosis in the absence of clinical disability;CL Martin;Multiple Sclerosis,2006

Cited by 36 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3