When Covid-19 first struck: Analysis of the influence of structural characteristics of countries - technocracy is strengthened by open democracy

Author:

Rigby Michael J.ORCID,Zdunek KingaORCID,Pecoraro FabrizioORCID,Cellini MarcoORCID,Luzi Daniela

Abstract

Context The Covid-19 pandemic hit the developed world differentially due to accidental factors, and countries had to respond rapidly within existing resources, structures, and processes to manage totally new health challenges. This study aimed to identify which pre-existing structural factors facilitated better outcomes despite different starting points, as understanding of the relative impact of structural aspects should facilitate achieving optimal forward progress. Methods Desk study, based on selecting and collecting a range of measures for 48 representative characteristics of 42 countries’ demography, society, health system, and policy-making profiles, matched to three pandemic time points. Different analytic approaches were employed including correlation, multiple regression, and cluster analysis in order to seek triangulation. Findings Population structure (except country size), and volume and nature of health resources, had only minor links to Covid impact. Depth of social inequality, poverty, population age structure, and strength of preventive health measures unexpectedly had no moderating effect. Strongest measured influences were population current enrolment in tertiary education, and country leaders’ strength of seeking scientific evidence. The representativeness, and by interpretation the empathy, of government leadership also had positive effects. Conclusion Strength of therapeutic health system, and indeed of preventive health services, surprisingly had little correlation with impact of the pandemic in the first nine months measured in death- or case-rates. However, specific political system features, including proportional representation electoral systems, and absence of a strong single party majority, were consistent features of the most successful national responses, as was being of a small or moderate population size, and with tertiary education facilitated. It can be interpreted that the way a country was lead, and whether leadership sought evidence and shared the reasoning behind resultant policies, had notable effects. This has significant implications within health system development and in promoting the population’s health.

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference40 articles.

1. World Health Organisation Regional Office for Europe. Strengthening health-system emergency preparedness. Toolkit for assessing health-system capacity for crisis management; WHO Copenhagen, 2012, (available on https://www.euro.who.int/data/assets/pdf_file/0008/157886/e96187.pdf

2. Evaluating the Quality of Medical Care;A Donabedian;Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly,1966

3. European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies. Covid-19 Health System Response Monitor; https://www.covid19healthsystem.org/mainpage.aspx (Accessed 25 March 2021)

4. Our World in Data. Policy Responses to the Coronavirus Pandemic; https://ourworldindata.org/policy-responses-covid (Accessed 25 March 2021)

5. Health Information and Quality Authority. Public health measures and strategies to limit the spread of COVID-19: an international review; Dublin 2021. (Available on https://www.hiqa.ie/sites/default/files/2021-03/Public-health-measures-and-strategies-to-limit-the-spread-of-COVID-19_0.pdf; accessed 25 March 2021)

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3