Abstract
One of the most important tools available to limit the spread and impact of infectious diseases is vaccination. It is therefore important to understand what factors determine people’s vaccination decisions. To this end, previous behavioural research made use of, (i) controlled but often abstract or hypothetical studies (e.g., vignettes) or, (ii) realistic but typically less flexible studies that make it difficult to understand individual decision processes (e.g., clinical trials). Combining the best of these approaches, we propose integrating real-world Bluetooth contacts via smartphones in several rounds of a game scenario, as a novel methodology to study vaccination decisions and disease spread. In our 12-week proof-of-concept study conducted with N = 494 students, we found that participants strongly responded to some of the information provided to them during or after each decision round, particularly those related to their individual health outcomes. In contrast, information related to others’ decisions and outcomes (e.g., the number of vaccinated or infected individuals) appeared to be less important. We discuss the potential of this novel method and point to fruitful areas for future research.
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference40 articles.
1. World Health Organization (WHO). 2018 assessment report of the Global Vaccine Action Plan: strategic advisory group of experts on immunization; 2018. Technical documents https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/276967.
2. Global impact of the first year of COVID-19 vaccination: a mathematical modelling study;OJ Watson;The Lancet Infectious Diseases,2022
3. World Health Organization (WHO). Ten threats to global health in 2019; 2019. Online https://www.who.int/news-room/spotlight/ten-threats-to-global-health-in-2019.
4. Vaccine hesitancy: Definition, scope and determinants;NE MacDonald;Vaccine,2015
5. Vaccine hesitancy: an overview;E Dubé;Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics,2013