External validation of a paediatric Smart triage model for use in resource limited facilities

Author:

Kigo JoyceORCID,Kamau Stephen,Mawji Alishah,Mwaniki Paul,Dunsmuir Dustin,Pillay YashodaniORCID,Zhang CherriORCID,Pallot Katija,Ogero Morris,Kimutai David,Ouma Mary,Mohamed Ismael,Chege Mary,Thuranira Lydia,Kissoon Niranjan,Ansermino J. Mark,Akech Samuel

Abstract

Models for digital triage of sick children at emergency departments of hospitals in resource poor settings have been developed. However, prior to their adoption, external validation should be performed to ensure their generalizability. We externally validated a previously published nine-predictor paediatric triage model (Smart Triage) developed in Uganda using data from two hospitals in Kenya. Both discrimination and calibration were assessed, and recalibration was performed by optimizing the intercept for classifying patients into emergency, priority, or non-urgent categories based on low-risk and high-risk thresholds. A total of 2539 patients were eligible at Hospital 1 and 2464 at Hospital 2, and 5003 for both hospitals combined; admission rates were 8.9%, 4.5%, and 6.8%, respectively. The model showed good discrimination, with area under the receiver-operator curve (AUC) of 0.826, 0.784 and 0.821, respectively. The pre-calibrated model at a low-risk threshold of 8% achieved a sensitivity of 93% (95% confidence interval, (CI):89%-96%), 81% (CI:74%-88%), and 89% (CI:85%–92%), respectively, and at a high-risk threshold of 40%, the model achieved a specificity of 86% (CI:84%–87%), 96% (CI:95%-97%), and 91% (CI:90%-92%), respectively. Recalibration improved the graphical fit, but new risk thresholds were required to optimize sensitivity and specificity.The Smart Triage model showed good discrimination on external validation but required recalibration to improve the graphical fit of the calibration plot. There was no change in the order of prioritization of patients following recalibration in the respective triage categories. Recalibration required new site-specific risk thresholds that may not be needed if prioritization based on rank is all that is required. The Smart Triage model shows promise for wider application for use in triage for sick children in different settings.

Funder

Wellcome Trust

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Reference38 articles.

1. UNICEF. UNICEF Data: Monitoring the situation of children and women 2020 [Available from: https://data.unicef.org/topic/child-survival/under-five-mortality/.

2. WHO. Child mortality and causes of death 2020 [Available from: https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/themes/topics/topic-details/GHO/child-mortality-and-causes-of-death.

3. Pediatric sepsis in the developing world;N Kissoon;Journal of Infection,2015

4. WHO. Children: improving survival and well-being 2020 [Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/children-reducing-mortality.

5. Organization WH. Guideline: updates on paediatric emergency triage, assessment and treatment: care of critically-ill children. Guideline: updates on paediatric emergency triage, assessment and treatment: care of critically-ill children2016.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3