Comparison of species-specific qPCR and metabarcoding methods to detect small pelagic fish distribution from open ocean environmental DNA

Author:

Yu Zeshu,Ito Shin-ichiORCID,Wong Marty Kwok-Shing,Yoshizawa Susumu,Inoue Jun,Itoh Sachihiko,Yukami Ryuji,Ishikawa Kazuo,Guo Chenying,Ijichi Minoru,Hyodo Susumu

Abstract

Environmental DNA (eDNA) is increasingly used to noninvasively monitor aquatic animals in freshwater and coastal areas. However, the use of eDNA in the open ocean (hereafter referred to OceanDNA) is still limited because of the sparse distribution of eDNA in the open ocean. Small pelagic fish have a large biomass and are widely distributed in the open ocean. We tested the performance of two OceanDNA analysis methods—species-specific qPCR (quantitative polymerase chain reaction) and MiFish metabarcoding using universal primers—to determine the distribution of small pelagic fish in the open ocean. We focused on six small pelagic fish species (Sardinops melanostictus, Engraulis japonicus, Scomber japonicus, Scomber australasicus, Trachurus japonicus, and Cololabis saira) and selected the Kuroshio Extension area as a testbed, because distribution of the selected species is known to be influenced by the strong frontal structure. The results from OceanDNA methods were compared to those of net sampling to test for consistency. Then, we compared the detection performance in each target fish between the using of qPCR and MiFish methods. A positive correlation was evident between the qPCR and MiFish detection results. In the ranking of the species detection rates and spatial distribution estimations, comparable similarity was observed between results derived from the qPCR and MiFish methods. In contrast, the detection rate using the qPCR method was always higher than that of the MiFish method. Amplification bias on non-target DNA and low sample DNA quantity seemed to partially result in a lower detection rate for the MiFish method; the reason is still unclear. Considering the ability of MiFish to detect large numbers of species and the quantitative nature of qPCR, the combined usage of the two methods to monitor quantitative distribution of small pelagic fish species with information of fish community structures was recommended.

Funder

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference64 articles.

1. Environmental DNA–An emerging tool in conservation for monitoring past and present biodiversity;Philip F. Thomsen;Biol Conserv,2015

2. The ecology of environmental DNA and implications for conservation genetics;Matthew A. Barnes;Conserv Genet,2015

3. Quantification of environmental DNA (eDNA) shedding and decay rates for three marine fish;Lauren M. Sassoubre;Environ Sci Technol,2016

4. Influence of sediment and stream transport on detecting a source of environmental DNA;Meredith B. Nevers;PLOS ONE,2020

5. An eDNA assay to monitor a globally invasive fish species from flowing freshwater;Patricia Burkhardt-Holm Irene Adrian-Kalchhauser;PLOS ONE,2016

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3