Author:
Col Nananda F.,Otero Diana,Lindman Brian R.,Horne Aaron,Levack Melissa M.,Ngo Long,Goodloe Kimberly,Strong Susan,Kaplan Elvin,Beaudry Melissa,Coylewright Megan
Abstract
Background
Guidelines recommend including the patient’s values and preferences when choosing treatment for severe aortic stenosis (sAS). However, little is known about what matters most to patients as they develop treatment preferences. Our objective was to identify, prioritize, and organize patient-reported goals and features of treatment for sAS.
Methods
This multi-center mixed-methods study conducted structured focus groups using the nominal group technique to identify patients’ most important treatment goals and features. Patients separately rated and grouped those items using card sorting techniques. Multidimensional scaling and hierarchical cluster analyses generated a cognitive map and clusters.
Results
51 adults with sAS and 3 caregivers with experience choosing treatment (age 36–92 years) were included. Participants were referred from multiple health centers across the U.S. and online. Eight nominal group meetings generated 32 unique treatment goals and 46 treatment features, which were grouped into 10 clusters of goals and 11 clusters of features. The most important clusters were: 1) trust in the healthcare team, 2) having good information about options, and 3) long-term outlook. Other clusters addressed the need for and urgency of treatment, being independent and active, overall health, quality of life, family and friends, recovery, homecare, and the process of decision-making.
Conclusions
These patient-reported items addressed the impact of the treatment decision on the lives of patients and their families from the time of decision-making through recovery, homecare, and beyond. Many attributes had not been previously reported for sAS. The goals and features that patients’ value, and the relative importance that they attach to them, differ from those reported in clinical trials and vary substantially from one individual to another. These findings are being used to design a shared decision-making tool to help patients and their clinicians choose a treatment that aligns with the patients’ priorities.
Trial registration
ClinicalTrials.gov, Trial ID: NCT04755426, Trial URL https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04755426.
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference52 articles.
1. The global burden of aortic stenosis;JJ Thaden;Prog Cardiovasc Dis,2014
2. 2020 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines;CM Otto;Circulation,2021
3. Shared decision making in older patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis: a systematic review;Judith J. A. M. van Beek-Peeters;Heart,2020
4. The Learning Curve for Shared Decision-making in Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis;M Coylewright;JAMA Cardiol,2020
5. Patient values and preferences on transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement therapy for aortic stenosis: a systematic review;L Lytvyn;BMJ Open,2016
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献