What matters most to patients with severe aortic stenosis when choosing treatment? Framing the conversation for shared decision making

Author:

Col Nananda F.,Otero Diana,Lindman Brian R.,Horne Aaron,Levack Melissa M.,Ngo Long,Goodloe Kimberly,Strong Susan,Kaplan Elvin,Beaudry Melissa,Coylewright Megan

Abstract

Background Guidelines recommend including the patient’s values and preferences when choosing treatment for severe aortic stenosis (sAS). However, little is known about what matters most to patients as they develop treatment preferences. Our objective was to identify, prioritize, and organize patient-reported goals and features of treatment for sAS. Methods This multi-center mixed-methods study conducted structured focus groups using the nominal group technique to identify patients’ most important treatment goals and features. Patients separately rated and grouped those items using card sorting techniques. Multidimensional scaling and hierarchical cluster analyses generated a cognitive map and clusters. Results 51 adults with sAS and 3 caregivers with experience choosing treatment (age 36–92 years) were included. Participants were referred from multiple health centers across the U.S. and online. Eight nominal group meetings generated 32 unique treatment goals and 46 treatment features, which were grouped into 10 clusters of goals and 11 clusters of features. The most important clusters were: 1) trust in the healthcare team, 2) having good information about options, and 3) long-term outlook. Other clusters addressed the need for and urgency of treatment, being independent and active, overall health, quality of life, family and friends, recovery, homecare, and the process of decision-making. Conclusions These patient-reported items addressed the impact of the treatment decision on the lives of patients and their families from the time of decision-making through recovery, homecare, and beyond. Many attributes had not been previously reported for sAS. The goals and features that patients’ value, and the relative importance that they attach to them, differ from those reported in clinical trials and vary substantially from one individual to another. These findings are being used to design a shared decision-making tool to help patients and their clinicians choose a treatment that aligns with the patients’ priorities. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, Trial ID: NCT04755426, Trial URL https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04755426.

Funder

Edwards Lifesciences

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference52 articles.

1. The global burden of aortic stenosis;JJ Thaden;Prog Cardiovasc Dis,2014

2. 2020 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines;CM Otto;Circulation,2021

3. Shared decision making in older patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis: a systematic review;Judith J. A. M. van Beek-Peeters;Heart,2020

4. The Learning Curve for Shared Decision-making in Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis;M Coylewright;JAMA Cardiol,2020

5. Patient values and preferences on transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement therapy for aortic stenosis: a systematic review;L Lytvyn;BMJ Open,2016

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3