Abstract
People differ in intelligence, cognitive ability, personality traits, motivation, and similar valued and, to a large degree, inherited characteristics that determine success and achievements. When does individual heterogeneity lead to a fair distribution of rewards and outcomes? Here, we develop this question theoretically and then test it experimentally for a set of structural conditions in a specific interaction situation. We first catalogue the functional relationship between individual endowments and outcomes to distinguish between fairness concepts such as meritocracy, equality of opportunity, equality of outcomes, and Rawl’s theory of justice. We then use an online experiment to study which of these fairness patterns emerge when differently endowed individuals can share their resources with others, depending on whether information about others’ endowments and outcomes is available. We find that while visible outcomes lessen inequality by decreasing the statistical dispersion of outcomes across the group, endowments need to be visible for better equality of opportunity for the most disadvantaged.
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference85 articles.
1. “Justice as Fairness.”;John Rawls;The Philosophical Review,1958
2. Justice as Fairness: A Restatement;John Rawls;Harvard University Press,2001
3. “Distributive Justice and Earned Income.”;Guillermina Jasso;American Sociological Review,1977
4. Power, Equity and Commitment in Exchange Networks.”;Karen S. Cook;American Sociological Review,1978
5. “Distributive Justice, Equity, and Equality.”;Karen S. Cook;Annual Review of Sociology,1983
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献