Abstract
This work demonstrates how a simulation of political discourse can be formulated using variables of the agents’ behaviors in a simulation, as thermodynamic variables. With these relations the methodology provides an approach to create a correspondence between the variables of an agent based social system and those of a thermodynamic system. Extended from this observation, diagrams akin to a P-V diagram for gases can be created for this social system. The basic thermodynamic variables of temperature, pressure and volume are defined from a system of agents with political and non-political actions engaged in simulated political discourse. An equation of state is defined for the simulated political phenomenon. Through this equation of state the full thermodynamic map of the system is presented under a P-V diagram with isothermal and isentropic lines, which is able to represent the political situation of the system at each point of time. The classic election cycle that takes place can be represented on this thermodynamic map (corresponding to an Otto cycle). This provides a possibility for researching macroscopic social cycles as a thermodynamic/informational cycle as the traces on the thermodynamic map show similarities to an Otto cycle. Such a formulation reinforces the endeavours of social physics to view social phenomena with physical principles.
Funder
Defense Sciences Office, DARPA
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference48 articles.
1. Political differentiation and the problem of dominance: Segmentation and hegemony;EO Eriksen;European Journal of Political Research,2018
2. Market segmentation and product differentiation in political campaigns: a technical feature perspective;PR Baines;Journal of Marketing Management,2003
3. Strategic political segmentation-A new approach for a new era of political marketing;G Smith;European Journal of Marketing,2001
4. The national rise in residential segregation;TD Logan;The Journal of Economic History,2017
5. Polarization in America: two possible futures;G Heltzel;Current opinion in behavioral sciences,2020