Abstract
Background
If communicated adequately, numerical decision-relevant information can support informed and shared decision making. Visual formats are recommended, but which format supports patients depending on their health literacy (HL) levels for specific decisions is unclear.
Study aim
The aim of this study is to investigate: 1) the effect of survival rates and side-effects presentation formats on comprehension and ‘feeling informed’; 2) differential effects among women with higher/lower HL, with adjuvant systemic breast cancer therapy as case example.
Methods
Two online experiments among women from the Dutch population without a history of breast cancer were conducted. Experiment 1 had a 3 (survival rate format: text block–bar graph–icon array) x 2 (HL: low–high) between-subjects design. Experiment 2 had a 5 (side-effects format: no probability information–probability information in numbers with or without a visualisation–probability information in numbers with or without a visualisation accompanied by a description of the side-effects) x 2 (HL: low–high) design. Primary outcomes were comprehension and feeling informed (Experiment 2 only). Formats were previously designed in co-creation with patients.
Results
In Experiment 1, presentation format did not affect gist or verbatim comprehension. Higher HL was associated with higher gist comprehension. Experiment 2 showed an interaction between presentation format and HL on ‘feeling informed’. When provided with visualised probability information without a description of the side-effects, women with lower HL felt better informed than women with higher HL.
Conclusion
Visual formats did not enhance comprehension of survival rate information beyond a well-designed text block format. However, none of the formats could overcome HL differences. When designing decision-relevant information, visualisations might not necessarily provide an advantage over structured numerical information for both patients with lower and higher HL. However, a deeper understanding of presenting side-effect information is warranted.
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference59 articles.
1. Shared decision making: a model for clinical practice;G Elwyn;Journal of General Internal Medicine,2012
2. Shared decision making: Concepts, evidence, and practice.;AM Stiggelbout;Patient Education and Counseling.,2015
3. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions;D Stacey;The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews,2017
4. Current Challenges When Using Numbers in Patient Decision Aids: Advanced Concepts.;LJ Trevena;Medical Decision Making,2021
5. Understanding the role of numeracy in health: proposed theoretical framework and practical insights.;IM Lipkus;Health Education & Behavior.,2009