Presenting decision-relevant numerical information to Dutch women aged 50–70 with varying levels of health literacy: Case example of adjuvant systemic therapy for breast cancer

Author:

van Strien-Knippenberg Inge S.ORCID,Timmermans Daniëlle R. M.ORCID,Engelhardt Ellen G.,Konings Inge R. H. M,Damman Olga C.

Abstract

Background If communicated adequately, numerical decision-relevant information can support informed and shared decision making. Visual formats are recommended, but which format supports patients depending on their health literacy (HL) levels for specific decisions is unclear. Study aim The aim of this study is to investigate: 1) the effect of survival rates and side-effects presentation formats on comprehension and ‘feeling informed’; 2) differential effects among women with higher/lower HL, with adjuvant systemic breast cancer therapy as case example. Methods Two online experiments among women from the Dutch population without a history of breast cancer were conducted. Experiment 1 had a 3 (survival rate format: text block–bar graph–icon array) x 2 (HL: low–high) between-subjects design. Experiment 2 had a 5 (side-effects format: no probability information–probability information in numbers with or without a visualisation–probability information in numbers with or without a visualisation accompanied by a description of the side-effects) x 2 (HL: low–high) design. Primary outcomes were comprehension and feeling informed (Experiment 2 only). Formats were previously designed in co-creation with patients. Results In Experiment 1, presentation format did not affect gist or verbatim comprehension. Higher HL was associated with higher gist comprehension. Experiment 2 showed an interaction between presentation format and HL on ‘feeling informed’. When provided with visualised probability information without a description of the side-effects, women with lower HL felt better informed than women with higher HL. Conclusion Visual formats did not enhance comprehension of survival rate information beyond a well-designed text block format. However, none of the formats could overcome HL differences. When designing decision-relevant information, visualisations might not necessarily provide an advantage over structured numerical information for both patients with lower and higher HL. However, a deeper understanding of presenting side-effect information is warranted.

Funder

Health~Holland

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Reference59 articles.

1. Shared decision making: a model for clinical practice;G Elwyn;Journal of General Internal Medicine,2012

2. Shared decision making: Concepts, evidence, and practice.;AM Stiggelbout;Patient Education and Counseling.,2015

3. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions;D Stacey;The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews,2017

4. Current Challenges When Using Numbers in Patient Decision Aids: Advanced Concepts.;LJ Trevena;Medical Decision Making,2021

5. Understanding the role of numeracy in health: proposed theoretical framework and practical insights.;IM Lipkus;Health Education & Behavior.,2009

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3