Knowledge, perceptions and practices on antimicrobial resistance in humans and animals in Wakiso district, Uganda: A cross sectional study

Author:

Musoke DavidORCID,Lubega Grace Biyinzika,Obeng Michael Brown,Brandish Claire,Winter JodyORCID,Niyongabo FiliminORCID,Russell-Hobbs Kate,Ng Bee Yean,Mugisha LawrenceORCID,Amir Saba,Kitutu Freddy Eric,Gibson Linda

Abstract

Despite increasing evidence on antimicrobial resistance (AMR), there is limited literature on antimicrobial access and use in humans and animals in community settings globally. This study assessed knowledge and perceptions of AMR, as well as practices relating to the use of antimicrobials in humans and animals in Wakiso district, Uganda. This was a cross-sectional study among 418 participants that employed quantitative data collection methods. A structured questionnaire that included questions on knowledge, perceptions, practices related to AMR, and perceptions on access to antimicrobials in humans and animals was used. Data was analysed in STATA version 10. The majority of participants 63.6% (266/418) had heard about AMR mainly from family and friends 57.5% (153/266), and most 70.8% (296/418) were aware that resistant microorganisms cause infections that are difficult to treat. Most participants 62.7% (262/418) thought that they should complete the full dose of antimicrobials when on treatment. However, on the last occasion of antimicrobial use, 13.0% (44/338) revealed that they did not complete the full course of treatment. Participants who were single (APR = 1.12, C.I = 1.03–1.12, p-value = 0.01) and earning between 91 and 290 USD on average per month (APR = 1.12, C.I = 1.02–1.23, p-value = 0.02) were more likely to have completed a given antimicrobial course as compared to those who were married/cohabiting and earned less than 15 USD respectively. The majority of participants 60% (251/418) owned animals, and 81.3% (204/251) reported using antimicrobials mainly for prevention 61.3% (125/204) or treatment of sick animals 70.6% (144/204). Among the participants, 57.4% (117/204) reported not having sold or consumed animal products within a week after exposure to antimicrobials. Interventions to prevent AMR should adopt a One Health approach to address the gap in knowledge and practices relating to the use of antimicrobials in humans and animals.

Funder

Department of Health and Social Care

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Reference53 articles.

1. Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis;CJ Murray;Lancet,2022

2. World Health Organization (WHO). Antimicrobial resistance and the United Nations sustainable development cooperation framework: guidance for United Nations country teams. 2021. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240036024. Accessed 15 Jan 2023

3. WHO. Global action plan on antimicrobial resistance. 2016. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241509763. Accessed 19 December 2022

4. Evidence of factors influencing self-medication with antibiotics in low and middle-income countries: a systematic scoping review;N Torres;Public Health,2019

5. ‘The disease isn’t listening to the drug’: The socio-cultural context of antibiotic use for viral respiratory infections in rural Uganda;R Yantzi;Glob Public Health,2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3