Inferring RNA-binding protein target preferences using adversarial domain adaptation
-
Published:2022-02-24
Issue:2
Volume:18
Page:e1009863
-
ISSN:1553-7358
-
Container-title:PLOS Computational Biology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:PLoS Comput Biol
Author:
Liu YingORCID,
Li RuihuiORCID,
Luo JiaweiORCID,
Zhang ZhaoleiORCID
Abstract
Precise identification of target sites of RNA-binding proteins (RBP) is important to understand their biochemical and cellular functions. A large amount of experimental data is generated by in vivo and in vitro approaches. The binding preferences determined from these platforms share similar patterns but there are discernable differences between these datasets. Computational methods trained on one dataset do not always work well on another dataset. To address this problem which resembles the classic “domain shift” in deep learning, we adopted the adversarial domain adaptation (ADDA) technique and developed a framework (RBP-ADDA) that can extract RBP binding preferences from an integration of in vivo and vitro datasets. Compared with conventional methods, ADDA has the advantage of working with two input datasets, as it trains the initial neural network for each dataset individually, projects the two datasets onto a feature space, and uses an adversarial framework to derive an optimal network that achieves an optimal discriminative predictive power. In the first step, for each RBP, we include only the in vitro data to pre-train a source network and a task predictor. Next, for the same RBP, we initiate the target network by using the source network and use adversarial domain adaptation to update the target network using both in vitro and in vivo data. These two steps help leverage the in vitro data to improve the prediction on in vivo data, which is typically challenging with a lower signal-to-noise ratio. Finally, to further take the advantage of the fused source and target data, we fine-tune the task predictor using both data. We showed that RBP-ADDA achieved better performance in modeling in vivo RBP binding data than other existing methods as judged by Pearson correlations. It also improved predictive performance on in vitro datasets. We further applied augmentation operations on RBPs with less in vivo data to expand the input data and showed that it can improve prediction performances. Lastly, we explored the predictive interpretability of RBP-ADDA, where we quantified the contribution of the input features by Integrated Gradients and identified nucleotide positions that are important for RBP recognition.
Funder
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Chinese Scholarship Council
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subject
Computational Theory and Mathematics,Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience,Genetics,Molecular Biology,Ecology,Modeling and Simulation,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference59 articles.
1. A census of human RNA-binding proteins;S Gerstberger;Nature Reviews Genetics,2014
2. RNA and disease;TA Cooper;Cell,2009
3. mRNA export and cancer;N Siddiqui;Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA,2012
4. Protein–RNA interactions: new genomic technologies and perspectives;J König;Nature Publishing Group,2012
5. HITS-CLIP: panoramic views of protein-RNA regulation in living cells;RB Darnell;Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA,2010
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献