Does the Committee Peer Review Select the Best Applicants for Funding? An Investigation of the Selection Process for Two European Molecular Biology Organization Programmes-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Does the Committee Peer Review Select the Best Applicants for Funding? An Investigation of the Selection Process for Two European Molecular Biology Organization Programmes

Published:2008-10-22 Issue:10 Volume:3 Page:e3480
ISSN:1932-6203
Container-title:PLoS ONE
language:en
Short-container-title:PLoS ONE

Author:

Bornmann Lutz,Wallon Gerlind,Ledin Anna

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference53 articles.

1. Real science. What it is, and what it means;J Ziman,2000

2. Improving the peer-review process for grant applications-reliability, validity, bias, and generalizability.;HW Marsh;American Psychologist,2008

3. The metrics of science and technology;E Geisler,2000

4. Research on research evaluations.;S Hemlin;Social Epistemology,1996

5. Recommendations for change at the NIH's Center for Scientific Review: phase 1 report, panel on scientific boundaries for review,2000

Cited by 86 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Funding Priorities and Health Outcomes in Danish Medical Research;Social Science & Medicine;2024-09

2. Putting Scholarly Impact in Context: Implications for Policymaking and Practice;Academy of Management Perspectives;2024-08

3. Path of excellence: A co-authorship network analysis of European Research Council grant winners in social sciences;Heliyon;2024-06

4. Exploring the determinants of research performance for early-career researchers: a literature review;Scientometrics;2023-11-17

5. Targeted, actionable and fair: Reviewer reports as feedback and its effect on ECR career choices;Research Evaluation;2023-10-01