Racial differences in quantitative optical coherence tomography angiography findings between older non-diabetics with co-morbidities

Author:

Moir JohnORCID,Rodriguez Sarah H.,Chun Lindsay Y.ORCID,Massamba Nathalie,Skondra DimitraORCID

Abstract

This cross-sectional study compared optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) parameters between older Black and White adults with systemic comorbidities in an effort to further understand racial differences in the retinal microvasculature. We analyzed vessel density at the superficial (SCP), intermediate (ICP), and deep capillary plexuses (DCP), foveal avascular zone (FAZ) parameters, and blood flow area (BFA) at the choriocapillaris. We used a mixed-effects linear regression model, controlling for hypertension and two eyes from the same subject, to compare OCTA parameters. Black subjects had lower foveal vessel density at the SCP and ICP, while no differences were observed at the parafovea or 3x3 mm macular area of any capillary layer. Black subjects had greater FAZ area, perimeter, and FD-300, a measurement of vessel density in a 300 μm wide ring around the FAZ. Black subjects also had lower BFA at the choriocapillaris. Within a cohort of subjects without hypertension, these differences remained statistically significant, with the exception of foveal vessel density at the SCP and foveal BFA of the choriocapillaris. These findings suggest that normative databases of OCTA parameters must strive to be diverse in nature to adequately capture differences across patient populations. Further study is required to understand if baseline differences in OCTA parameters contribute to epidemiological disparities in ocular diseases.

Funder

Illinois Society for the Prevention of Blindness

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3