Abstract
As novelty is a core value in science, a reliable approach to measuring the novelty of scientific documents is critical. Previous novelty measures however had a few limitations. First, the majority of previous measures are based on recombinant novelty concept, attempting to identify a novel combination of knowledge elements, but insufficient effort has been made to identify a novel element itself (element novelty). Second, most previous measures are not validated, and it is unclear what aspect of newness is measured. Third, some of the previous measures can be computed only in certain scientific fields for technical constraints. This study thus aims to provide a validated and field-universal approach to computing element novelty. We drew on machine learning to develop a word embedding model, which allows us to extract semantic information from text data. Our validation analyses suggest that our word embedding model does convey semantic information. Based on the trained word embedding, we quantified the element novelty of a document by measuring its distance from the rest of the document universe. We then carried out a questionnaire survey to obtain self-reported novelty scores from 800 scientists. We found that our element novelty measure is significantly correlated with self-reported novelty in terms of discovering and identifying new phenomena, substances, molecules, etc. and that this correlation is observed across different scientific fields.
Funder
Lars Erik Lundbergs Stiftelse för Forskning och Utbildning
Swedish Foundation for International Cooperation in Research and Higher Education
Japan Society for Aeronautical and Space Sciences
Scientific Research Funding for Overseas High-Caliber Personnel of Shenzhen
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference50 articles.
1. Competition in science;WO Hagstrom;Amer Sociological Rev,1974
2. The specificity of the scientific field and the social conditions for the progress of reason;P. Bourdieu;Social Science Information,1975
3. Measuring Technological Innovation over the Long Run. American Economic Review;B Kelly;Insights,2021
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献