Development of a discrete choice experiment questionnaire to elicit preferences by pregnant women and policymakers for the expansion of non-invasive prenatal screening

Author:

Nguyen Hung ManhORCID,Lindsay Carmen,Baradaran Mohammad,Guertin Jason RobertORCID,Nshimyumukiza Leon,Soukkhaphone Bounhome,Reinharz DanielORCID

Abstract

Objective An instrument for measuring intervention preferences applicable to both patients and policymakers would make it possible to better confront the needs of the supply and demand sides of the health care system. This study aimed to develop a discrete choice experiments (DCE) questionnaire to elicit the preferences of patients and policymakers. The instrument was specifically developed to estimate preferences for new conditions to be added to a screening program for fetal chromosomal anomalies. Methods A DCE development study was conducted. The methods employed included a literature review, a qualitative study (based on individual semi-structured interviews, consultations, and a focus group discussion) with pregnant women and policymakers, and a pilot project with 33 pregnant women to validate the first version of the instrument and test the feasibility of its administration. Results An initial list of 10 attributes was built based on a literature review and the qualitative research components of the study. Five attributes were built based on the responses provided by the participants from both groups. Eight attributes were consensually retained. A pilot project performed on 33 pregnant women led to a final instrument containing seven attributes: ‘conditions to be screened’, ‘test performance’, ‘moment at gestational age to obtain the test result’, ‘degree of test result certainty to the severity of the disability’, ‘test sufficiency’, ‘information provided from test result’, and ‘cost related to the test’. Conclusion It is possible to reach a consensus on the construction of a DCE instrument intended to be administered to pregnant women and policymakers. However, complete validation of the consensual instrument is limited because there are too few voting members of health technology assessment agencies committees to statistically ascertain the relevance of the attributes and their levels.

Funder

Genome Canada

Canadian Institutes of Health Research

Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference44 articles.

1. Health technology assessment (HTA) and economic evaluation: efficiency or fairness first;J Richardson;J Mark Access Health Policy,2019

2. The Role of Patient Preferences in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: A Conflict of Values;JE Brazier;PharmacoEconomics,2009

3. Noninvasive prenatal testing for trisomies 21, 18, and 13, sex chromosome aneuploidies, and microdeletions: a health technology assessment;Health Quality Ontario;Ont Health Technol Assess Ser Internet,2019

4. Sequencing of circulating cell-free DNA during pregnancy;DW Bianchi;N Engl J Med,2018

5. What attributes should be included in a discrete choice experiment related to health technologies? A systematic literature review;M Trapero-Bertran;PLOS ONE,2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3