Abstract
Although vaccination is widely considered one of the most cost-effective health interventions available, global coverage rates for many vaccines remain lower than necessary for disease elimination and eradication. New vaccine technologies can play an important role in addressing barriers to vaccination and increasing coverage rates. To identify and prioritize vaccine technology investments, decision makers must be able to compare the overall costs and benefits of each investment option. While these data points may exist, they are often confined to silos. Decision makers would benefit from a model that synthesizes this broad range of data and provides clear and actionable information. To facilitate vaccine investment, purchasing and deployment decisions, we developed a systematic and transparent cost-benefit model that estimates the value and risk of a given investment scenario from the perspective of both “buyers” (e.g., global donors, country governments) and “sellers” (e.g., developers, manufacturers) of vaccines. This model, which can be used to evaluate scenarios related to a single vaccine presentation or a portfolio of vaccine presentations, leverages our published approach for estimating the impact of improved vaccine technologies on vaccination coverage rates. This article presents a description of the model and provides an illustrative example application to a portfolio of measles-rubella vaccine technologies currently under development. Although the model is generally applicable to organizations involved in vaccine investment, manufacturing or purchasing, we believe it may be particularly useful to those engaged in vaccine markets that rely strongly on funding from institutional donors.
Funder
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference31 articles.
1. Return On Investment From Childhood Immunization In Low- And Middle-Income Countries, 2011–20.;S Ozawa;Health Affairs,2016
2. Muhoza P. Routine Vaccination Coverage—Worldwide, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 70. Epub ahead of print 2021. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7043a1
3. Prioritizing investments in new vaccines against epidemic infectious diseases: A multi-criteria decision analysis;D Gouglas;Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis,2019
4. How can we evaluate the potential of innovative vaccine products and technologies in resource constrained settings? A total systems effectiveness (TSE) approach to decision-making;S Botwright;Vaccine: X,2020
5. The Vaccine Innovation Prioritisation Strategy, https://www.gavi.org/our-alliance/market-shaping/vaccine-innovation-prioritisation-strategy (accessed 29 January 2022).