Self-selection biases in psychological studies: Personality and affective disorders are prevalent among participants

Author:

Kaźmierczak IzabelaORCID,Zajenkowska Anna,Rogoza Radosław,Jonason Peter K.,Ścigała Dawid

Abstract

Respondents select the type of psychological studies that they want to participate in consistence with their needs and individual characteristics, which creates an unintentional self-selection bias. The question remains whether participants attracted by psychological studies may have more psychological dysfunctions related to personality and affective disorders compared to the general population. We investigated (N = 947; 62% women) whether the type of the invitation (to talk about recent critical or regular life events) or the source of the data (either face-to-face or online) attracts people with different psychopathology. Most importantly, participants who alone applied to take part in paid psychological studies had more symptoms of personality disorders than those who had never before applied to take part in psychological studies. The current results strongly translate into a recommendation for either the modification of recruitment strategies or much greater caution when generalizing results for this methodological reason.

Funder

Maria Grzegorzewska University

National Center of Science

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference42 articles.

1. You get who you pay for: The impact of incentives on participation bias.;G Hsieh;In Proceedings of the 19th ACM conference on computer-supported cooperative work & social computing,2016

2. Patients with personality disorders: functional status, health care utilization, and satisfaction with care;WJ Hueston;Journal of Family Practice,1996

3. The volunteer subject;R. Rosenthal;Human Relations,1965

4. Biased Attention to Facial Expressions of Ambiguous Emotions in Borderline Personality Disorder: An Eye-Tracking Study.;D Kaiser;Journal of Personality Disorders,2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3