Abstract
Computational modelling of biological processes poses multiple challenges in each stage of the modelling exercise. Some significant challenges include identifiability, precisely estimating parameters from limited data, informative experiments and anisotropic sensitivity in the parameter space. One of these challenges’ crucial but inconspicuous sources is the possible presence of large regions in the parameter space over which model predictions are nearly identical. This property, known as sloppiness, has been reasonably well-addressed in the past decade, studying its possible impacts and remedies. However, certain critical unanswered questions concerning sloppiness, particularly related to its quantification and practical implications in various stages of system identification, still prevail. In this work, we systematically examine sloppiness at a fundamental level and formalise two new theoretical definitions of sloppiness. Using the proposed definitions, we establish a mathematical relationship between the parameter estimates’ precision and sloppiness in linear predictors. Further, we develop a novel computational method and a visual tool to assess the goodness of a model around a point in parameter space by identifying local structural identifiability and sloppiness and finding the most sensitive and least sensitive parameters for non-infinitesimal perturbations. We demonstrate the working of our method in benchmark systems biology models of various complexities. The pharmacokinetic HIV infection model analysis identified a new set of biologically relevant parameters that can be used to control the free virus in an active HIV infection.
Funder
Ministry of Education, Government of India
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference41 articles.
1. A whole-cell computational model predicts phenotype from genotype;JR Karr;Cell,2012
2. A quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) model for Pneumocystis treatment in mice;GS Liu;BMC Systems Biology,2018
3. Beyond the single average tumor: Understanding IO combinations using a clinical QSP model that incorporates heterogeneity in patient response;R Kumar;CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology,2021
4. Reverse engineering and identification in systems biology: Strategies, perspectives and challenges;A Villaverde;Journal of the Royal Society, Interface / the Royal Society,2014
5. Universally Sloppy Parameter Sensitivities in Systems Biology Models;RN Gutenkunst;PLoS Computational Biology,2007