The Comparing of Problem-Based Learning and Lecture-Based Learning on Students’ Learning Outcomes and Satisfaction for a Family Health Nursing Course

Author:

Susanto TantutORCID,Rasni Hanny,Susumaningrum Latifa Aini,Adi Yunanto Rismawan

Abstract

Background: Problem - Based Learning (PBL) is a method of student-centered learning. In PBL, students become centered to the learning process, whereas the teacher is the center of learning in lecture-based learning (LBL). Purpose: This study aimed to compare the effects of PBL and LBL on students’ learning outcomes and satisfaction on an undergraduate nursing course. Methods: Quasi-experimental study. Participants included 161 students from two different classes of the course; in 2013, as a control group (n = 88) and in 2014 as an intervention group (n = 73). Both groups received LBL, which is practice in the lab and clinic, but the intervention group also received PBL. Secondary data analysis of students’ learning outcomes was measured using students’ learning progress in tests from lecture (theory, paper, laboratory, and clinical), while students’ satisfaction was measured using teaching method evaluation from students. Results: Students’ learning outcomes (theory, laboratory, and clinical) in the PBL group were significantly more than in the control group (p<0.001), whereas paper lesson outcomes were higher in control group compared to the intervention group (t=6.43; p<0.001; 95% CI=1.46-2.76). There was more satisfaction with the PBL method. There was no relationship between students’ satisfaction and learning outcomes (p>0.05). However, students considered greater satisfaction in PBL compared to LBL. Conclusions: In problem-based learning, students contributed a lot to solving the problem and getting the skills and knowledge they needed. Students are also expected to be motivated.

Publisher

Universitas Padjadjaran

Subject

Community and Home Care,Critical Care Nursing,Pshychiatric Mental Health

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3