Affiliation:
1. Omdurman Islamic University
Abstract
This study compared the bioavailability and antihyperglycemic effect of 5 mg glibenclamide tablets available in Sudan. Nine healthy subjects were given a 5 mg dose of either micronized glibenclamide tablets (Euglucon®) or conventional non-micronized glibenclamide tablets (locally manufactured items). Blood samples were collected at 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 hours and analyzed for glucose concentrations. The maximum mean serum concentration of the drug (Cmax) and the mean time to maximum serum concentration (Tmax) were calculated, and the area under the concentration versus time curve (AUC) and the drug clearance (Cl) were also recorded. The mean glucose concentration was also determined in different time intervals. The results show no significant difference in the mean Tmax between the tested items. However, the mean Cmax is significantly higher (p 0.001) when the non-micronized tablets are taken (456 ng/mL) rather than the micronized tablets (291 ng/mL). Similarly, the mean AUC0-8h is significantly higher (p 0.001) with the non-micronized tablets (1915 ng/mL.h) than with the micronized tablets (1163 ng/mL.h). After 8 hours, the subjects in the micronized group had a drug clearance of 0.0430 L/Kg.h, and a clearance of 0.0260 L/Kg.h was recorded in the unmicronized group. Both tablets lower the mean glucose concentrations of the nine volunteers after 8 hours, 99 mg/dL for micronized tablets and 98 mg/dL for non-micronized tablets. Overall, the non-micronized glibenclamide tablet used in this study similarly lowered the glucose concentrations in healthy volunteer subjects to that of imported micronized glibenclamide tablets.
Publisher
Universitas Muhammadiyah Palangkaraya
Reference26 articles.
1. 1. Joiner JB, Prasher A, Young IC, Kim J, Shrivastava R, Maturavongsadit P, et al. Effects of Drug Physicochemical Properties on In-Situ Forming Implant Polymer Degradation and Drug Release Kinetics. Pharmaceutics. 2022;14(6):1188. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics14061188
2. 2. Dulla O, Sultana S, Hosen MS. In vitro comparative quality evaluation of different brands of esomeprazole tablets available in selected community pharmacies in Dhaka, Bangladesh. BMC Res Notes 2018;11(1):184. doi:10.1186/s13104-018-3285-x
3. 3. Ding D, Liu C, Zhang Y, Xu W, Cai Y, Zhong T, et al. Mechanistic insights of different release behaviors dominated by drug physicochemical properties in polyisobutylene pressure sensitive adhesive. Int J Pharm. 2023;630:122416. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2022.122416
4. 4. Hermansyah A, Wulandari L, Kristina SA, Meilianti S. Primary health care policy and vision for community pharmacy and pharmacists in Indonesia. Pharm Pract. 2020;18(3):2085. doi:10.18549/pharmpract.2020.3.2085
5. 5. Omer AM, Ali GK. Assessment of the Substandard Drugs in Developing Countries: The Impact of the Pharmaceutical Regulations on the Quality of Medicines on the Sudanese Market Importers’ Perspective. Med Res Chronicles 2014;1(1):30-48.