Abstract
Cement-based materials are the world's most widely utilized construction materials due to their
high compressive strength. However, they need reinforcement to withstand direct or indirect
tensile forces. This study evaluated the potential use of 3D-printed polymers as an alternative
reinforcement in cement-based composites. Polyethylene terephthalate glycol (PETG), Polyamide (PA), and Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) based triangular and honeycomb-patterned 3D-printed reinforcements were incorporated into cement-based composites, and their
mechanical performances were compared under three-point flexural tests by considering both
polymer and pattern type. Both triangular and honeycomb patterns enhanced flexural behavior. Considering all filaments, the honeycomb pattern was found more effective than the triangular one for increasing flexural strength, deflection capacity, and toughness up to 46.80%,
251.85%, and 77.66%, respectively. In the case of filament type, 3D-printed PA-type filament in
a honeycomb pattern preserved flexural strength, enhanced deflection capacity, and increased
flexural toughness with pseudo-deflection hardening behavior. 3D-printed honeycomb patterned reinforcements produced by PA have the opportunity to be used in the manufacture of
cement-based composites.
Publisher
Yildiz Technical University
Reference25 articles.
1. [1] American Society for Testing and Materials. (2012).
Standard terminology for additive manufactur ing technologies (ASTM Standard No. F2792-12).
https://www.astm.org/f2792-12.html
2. [2] Hull, C. W. (1984). Apparatus for production of
three-dimensional objects by stereolithography. U.S.
Patent No. 4,575,330. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent
and Trademark Office.
3. [3] Crump, S. S. (1989). Apparatus and method for
creating three-dimensional objects. U.S. Patent No.
CA2027731C. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and
Trademark Office.
4. [4] Mo, K. H., Alengaram, U. J., & Jumaat, M. Z. (2016).
Structural performance of reinforced geopolymer
concrete members: A review. Construction and
Building Materials, 120, 251–264. [CrossRef]
5. [5] Bassurucu, M., Fenerli, C., Kına C., & Akbas, S. D.
(2022). Effect of fiber type, shape, and volume frac tion on mechanical and flexural properties of con crete. Journal of Sustainable Construction Materials
and Technologies, 7(3), 158–171. [CrossRef]