A point-prevalence study on community and inpatient Clostridioides difficile infections (CDI): results from Combatting Bacterial Resistance in Europe CDI (COMBACTE-CDI), July to November 2018

Author:

Viprey Virginie F1,Davis Georgina L1,Benson Anthony D1,Ewin Duncan1,Spittal William1,Vernon Jon J1,Rupnik Maja234,Banz Alice5,Allantaz Florence5,Cleuziat Philippe5,Wilcox Mark H621,Davies Kerrie A621, ,

Affiliation:

1. Healthcare Associated Infections Research Group, Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom

2. European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) Study Group for Clostridioides difficile (ESGCD)

3. Faculty of Medicine, University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia

4. National Laboratory for Health, Environment and Food, Maribor, Slovenia

5. bioMérieux, Marcy L'Etoile, France

6. Department of Microbiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom

Abstract

Background There is a paucity of data on community-based Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) and how these compare with inpatient CDI. Aim To compare data on the populations with CDI in hospitals vs the community across 12 European countries. Methods For this point-prevalence study (July–November 2018), testing sites sent residual diagnostic material on sampling days to a coordinating laboratory for CDI testing and PCR ribotyping (n = 3,163). Information on whether CDI testing was requested at the original site was used to identify undiagnosed CDI. We used medical records to identify differences between healthcare settings in patient demographics and risk factors for detection of C. difficile with or without free toxin. Results The CDI positivity rate was 4.4% (country range: 0–16.2) in hospital samples, and 1.3% (country range: 0–2.2%) in community samples. The highest prevalence of toxinotype IIIb (027, 181 and 176) was seen in eastern European countries (56%; 43/77), the region with the lowest testing rate (58%; 164/281). Different predisposing risk factors were observed (use of broad-spectrum penicillins in the community (OR: 8.09 (1.9–35.6), p = 0.01); fluoroquinolones/cephalosporins in hospitals (OR: 2.2 (1.2–4.3), p = 0.01; OR: 2.0 (1.1–3.7), p = 0.02)). Half of community CDI cases were undetected because of absence of clinical suspicion, accounting for three times more undiagnosed adults in the community compared with hospitals (ca 111,000 vs 37,000 cases/year in Europe). Conclusion These findings support recommendations for improving diagnosis in patients presenting with diarrhoea in the community, to guide good practice to limit the spread of CDI.

Publisher

European Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (ECDC)

Subject

Virology,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Epidemiology

Cited by 21 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3