Affiliation:
1. University of Kirsehir Ahi Evran
2. University of Ege
Abstract
In this study, the impact of data preprocessing on the prediction
of 305-day milk yield using neural networks were investigated
with regard to the effect of different normalization techniques.
Eight normalization techniques “Z-Score, Min-Max, D-Min-Max,
Median, Sigmoid, Decimal Scaling, Median and MAD, TanhEstimators"
and five different back propagation algorithms
“Levenberg-Marquardt (LM), Bayesian Regularization (BR),
Scaled Conjugate Gradient (SCG), Conjugate Gradient Back
propagation with Powell-Beale Restarts (CGB) and Brayde
Fletcher Gold Farlo Shanno Quasi Newton Back propagation
(BFG)” were examined and tested comparatively for the
analysis. Neural network architecture was optimized and tested
with several experiments. Results of the analysis show that
applying different normalization techniques affect the
performance and the distribution of outputs influences the
learning process of the neural network. The magnitude of the
effects varied with the type of back propagation algorithms,
activation functions, and network's architectural structure.
According to the results of the analysis, the most successful
performance value in the 305-day milk yield estimation was
obtained by using the neural network structured by using the
Decimal Scaling normalization technique with the Bayesian
Regulation algorithm (R2Adj = 0.8181, RMSE= 0.0068, MAPE=
160.42 for test set; R2Adj =0.8141, RMSE= 0.0067, MAPE= 114.12
for validation set).
Publisher
Turkish Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research
Reference52 articles.
1. Akıllı A (2019). Analysis of agricultural data with multivariate nonlinear fuzzy regression method. PhD Thesis, Kırşehir Ahi Evran University, Institute of Science, Department of Zootechnics, p. 249, Kırşehir, Turkey (in Turkish).
2. Atıl H and Akıllı A (2016). Comparison of artificial neural network and K-means for clustering dairy cattle. International Journal of Sustainable Agricultural Management and Informatics, 2 (1): 40-52.
3. Brown-Brandl TM, Jones DD and Woldt WE (2005). Evaluating modelling techniques for cattle heat stress prediction. Biosystems Engineering, 91 (4): 513-524.
4. Chen LJ, Cui LY, Xing L and Han LJ (2008). Prediction of the nutrient content in dairy manure using artificial neural network modeling. Journal of Dairy Science, 91: 4822-4829.
5. Cihan P, Kalıpsız O and Gökçe E (2017). Effect of normalization techniques on artificial neural network and feature selection performance in animal disease diagnosis. Electronic Turkish Studies, 12 (11): 59-70.
Cited by
17 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献