Author:
Perumal R,Naidoo K,Naidoo A,Padayatchi N
Abstract
Background. The clinical significance of low antituberculosis (anti-TB) drug concentrations has not been fully elucidated.Objectives. To investigate the clinical consequences of first-line drug concentrations in adult patients with drug-susceptible pulmonary TBin South Africa (SA).Method. We conducted a pharmacokinetic study nested within the control arm of the Improving Treatment Success (IMPRESS) trial(NCT 02114684) in Durban, SA. During the first 2 months of treatment, participants received weight-based dosing of first-line anti-TBdrugs (rifampicin, isoniazid, pyrazinamide and ethambutol), and had plasma drug concentrations measured at 2 and 6 hours after drugadministration during the 8th week of treatment. Intermediate (8 weeks), end-of-treatment (6 months) and follow-up TB outcomes wereassessed using World Health Organization criteria.Results. We measured plasma drug concentrations on available samples in 43 participants. Peak drug concentrations were below thetherapeutic range in 39/43 (90.7%) for rifampicin, 32/43 (74.4%) for isoniazid, 27/42 (64.3%) for pyrazinamide and 5/41 (12.2%) forethambutol. At the end of the intensive phase of treatment (week 8), 20.9% (n=9/43) of participants remained culture positive. We did notfind a relationship between the concentrations of first-line drugs and treatment outcomes at week 8. All participants were cured at the endof treatment, and there were no relapses during the 12-month follow-up period.Conclusion. Treatment outcomes were favourable despite low drug concentrations as defined by current reference thresholds.
Publisher
South African Medical Association NPC
Reference49 articles.
1. World Health Organization. Global tuberculosis report 2020. Geneva: WHO, 2020. https://www.who. int/publications/i/item/9789240013131 (accessed 21 August 2021).
2. World Health Organization. The End TB Strategy: Global strategy and targets for tuberculosis prevention, care, and control after 2015. Geneva: WHO, 2015. https://www.who.int/publications/i/ item/WHO-HTM-TB-2015.19 (accessed 23 August 2021).
3. Gumbo T, Angulo-Barturen I, Ferrer-Bazaga S. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic and dose- response relationships of antituberculosis drugs: Recommendations and standards for industry and academia. J Infect Dis 2015;211(Suppl 3):S96-S106. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiu610
4. Wilkins JJ, Savic RM, Karlsson MO, et al. Population pharmacokinetics of rifampin in pulmonary tuberculosis patients, including a semimechanistic model to describe variable absorption. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2008;52(6):2138-2148. https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.00461-07
5. Wilkins JJ, Langdon G, McIlleron H, Pillai GC, Smith PJ, Simonsson US. Variability in the population pharmacokinetics of pyrazinamide in South African tuberculosis patients. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2006;62(9):727-735. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-006-0141-z