Evaluation of Systematic Reviews of Interventions for Retina and Vitreous Conditions-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Evaluation of Systematic Reviews of Interventions for Retina and Vitreous Conditions

Published:2019-12-01 Issue:12 Volume:137 Page:1399
ISSN:2168-6165
Container-title:JAMA Ophthalmology
language:en
Short-container-title:JAMA Ophthalmol

Author:

Le Jimmy T.¹,Qureshi Riaz¹,Twose Claire²,Rosman Lori²,Han Genie¹,Fapohunda Kolade¹,Saldanha Ian J.³⁴,Scherer Roberta W.¹,Lum Flora⁵,Al-Rajhi Ali⁵,Musch David C.⁶⁷,Hawkins Barbara S.⁸,Dickersin Kay¹,Li Tianjing¹

Affiliation:

1. Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland

2. Welch Medical Library, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland

3. Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice (Primary), Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island

4. Department of Epidemiology (Joint), Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island

5. American Academy of Ophthalmology, San Francisco, California

6. Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

7. Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

8. Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Subject

Ophthalmology

Link

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaophthalmology/articlepdf/2752550/jamaophthalmology_le_2019_oi_190071.pdf

Reference32 articles.

1. What comparative effectiveness research is needed? a framework for using guidelines and systematic reviews to identify evidence gaps and research priorities.;Li;Ann Intern Med,2012

2. Setting priorities for comparative effectiveness research on management of primary angle closure: a survey of Asia-Pacific clinicians.;Yu;J Glaucoma,2015

3. Interventions for age-related macular degeneration: are practice guidelines based on systematic reviews?;Lindsley;Ophthalmology,2016

4. Setting priorities for diabetic retinopathy clinical research and identifying evidence gaps.;Le;Ophthalmol Retina,2017

5. The quality of systematic reviews about interventions for refractive error can be improved: a review of systematic reviews.;Mayo-Wilson;BMC Ophthalmol,2017

Cited by 22 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Methodological and reporting quality assessment of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the association between sleep duration and hypertension;Systematic Reviews;2024-08-06

2. Reporting quality of acupuncture overviews: A methodological investigation based on the PRIOR statement;Complementary Therapies in Medicine;2024-06

3. Investigate the relationship between the retraction reasons and the quality of methodology in non-Cochrane retracted systematic reviews: a systematic review;Systematic Reviews;2024-01-12

4. Interventions for Dry Eye;JAMA Ophthalmology;2024-01-01

5. Reporting quality and risk of bias of systematic reviews of ultra-processed foods: a methodological study;European Journal of Clinical Nutrition;2023-12-13