Disparities in Travel-Related Barriers to Accessing Health Care From the 2017 National Household Travel Survey

Author:

Labban Muhieddine12,Chen Chang-Rong3,Frego Nicola124,Nguyen David-Dan5,Lipsitz Stuart R.2,Reich Amanda J.2,Rebbeck Timothy R.67,Choueiri Toni K.8,Kibel Adam S.1,Iyer Hari S.69,Trinh Quoc-Dien12

Affiliation:

1. Division of Urological Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

2. Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

3. Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy

4. Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy

5. Division of Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

6. Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts

7. Department of Epidemiology and Zhu Family Center for Global Cancer Prevention, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts

8. Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts

9. Section of Cancer Epidemiology and Health Outcomes, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick

Abstract

ImportanceGeographic access, including mode of transportation, to health care facilities remains understudied.ObjectiveTo identify sociodemographic factors associated with public vs private transportation use to access health care and identify the respondent, trip, and community factors associated with longer distance and time traveled for health care visits.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cross-sectional study used data from the 2017 National Household Travel Survey, including 16 760 trips or a nationally weighted estimate of 5 550 527 364 trips to seek care in the United States. Households that completed the recruitment and retrieval survey for all members aged 5 years and older were included. Data were analyzed between June and August 2022.ExposuresMode of transportation (private vs public transportation) used to seek care.Main Outcomes and MeasuresSurvey-weighted multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with public vs private transportation and self-reported distance and travel time. Then, for each income category, an interaction term of race and ethnicity with type of transportation was used to estimate the specific increase in travel burden associated with using public transportation compared a private vehicle for each race category.ResultsThe sample included 12 092 households and 15 063 respondents (8500 respondents [56.4%] aged 51-75 years; 8930 [59.3%] females) who had trips for medical care, of whom 1028 respondents (6.9%) were Hispanic, 1164 respondents (7.8%) were non-Hispanic Black, and 11 957 respondents (79.7%) were non-Hispanic White. Factors associated with public transportation use included non-Hispanic Black race (compared with non-Hispanic White: adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 3.54 [95% CI, 1.90-6.61]; P < .001) and household income less than $25 000 (compared with ≥$100 000: aOR, 7.16 [95% CI, 3.50-14.68]; P < .001). The additional travel time associated with use of public transportation compared with private vehicle use varied by race and household income, with non-Hispanic Black respondents with income of $25 000 to $49 999 experiencing higher burden associated with public transportation (mean difference, 81.9 [95% CI, 48.5-115.3] minutes) than non-Hispanic White respondents with similar income (mean difference, 25.5 [95% CI, 17.5-33.5] minutes; P < .001).Conclusions and RelevanceThese findings suggest that certain racial, ethnic, and socioeconomically disadvantaged populations rely on public transportation to seek health care and that reducing delays associated with public transportation could improve care for these patients.

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3