Development and Validation of a Machine Learning–Based Model of Mortality Risk in First-Episode Psychosis

Author:

Lieslehto Johannes12,Tiihonen Jari134,Lähteenvuo Markku1,Leucht Stefan5,Correll Christoph U.678,Mittendorfer-Rutz Ellenor2,Tanskanen Antti123,Taipale Heidi1239

Affiliation:

1. Department of Forensic Psychiatry, Niuvanniemi Hospital, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio

2. Division of Insurance Medicine, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

3. Center for Psychiatry Research, Stockholm City Council, Stockholm, Sweden

4. Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

5. Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany

6. The Zucker Hillside Hospital, Department of Psychiatry, Northwell Health, Glen Oaks, New York

7. Department of Psychiatry and Molecular Medicine, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, New York

8. Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany

9. School of Pharmacy, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio

Abstract

ImportanceThere is an absence of mortality risk assessment tools in first-episode psychosis (FEP) that could enable personalized interventions.ObjectiveTo examine the feasibility of machine learning (ML) in discerning mortality risk in FEP and to assess whether such risk predictions can inform pharmacotherapy choices.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsIn this prognostic study, Swedish nationwide cohort data (from July 1, 2006, to December 31, 2021) were harnessed for model development and validation. Finnish cohort data (from January 1, 1998, to December 31, 2017) were used for external validation. Data analyses were completed between December 2022 and December 2023.Main Outcomes and MeasuresFifty-one nationwide register variables, encompassing demographics and clinical and work-related histories, were subjected to ML to predict future mortality risk. The ML model’s performance was evaluated by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). The comparative effectiveness of pharmacotherapies in patients was assessed and was stratified by the ML model to those with predicted high mortality risk (vs low risk), using the between-individual hazard ratio (HR). The 5 most important variables were then identified and a model was retrained using these variables in the discovery sample.ResultsThis study included 24 052 Swedish participants (20 000 in the discovery sample and 4052 in the validation sample) and 1490 Finnish participants (in the validation sample). Swedish participants had a mean (SD) age of 29.1 (8.1) years, 62.1% were men, and 418 died with 2 years. Finnish participants had a mean (SD) age of 29.7 (8.0) years, 61.7% were men, and 31 died within 2 years. The discovery sample achieved an AUROC of 0.71 (95% CI, 0.68-0.74) for 2-year mortality prediction. Using the 5 most important variables (ie, the top 10% [substance use comorbidities, first hospitalization duration due to FEP, male sex, prior somatic hospitalizations, and age]), the final model resulted in an AUROC of 0.70 (95% CI, 0.63-0.76) in the Swedish sample and 0.67 (95% CI, 0.56-0.78) in the Finnish sample. Individuals with predicted high mortality risk had an elevated 15-year risk in the Swedish sample (HR, 3.77 [95% CI, 2.92-4.88]) and an elevated 20-year risk in the Finnish sample (HR, 3.72 [95% CI, 2.67-5.18]). For those with predicted high mortality risk, long-acting injectable antipsychotics (HR, 0.45 [95% CI, 0.23-0.88]) and mood stabilizers (HR, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.46-0.90]) were associated with decreased mortality risk. Conversely, for those predicted to survive, only oral aripiprazole (HR, 0.38 [95% CI, 0.20-0.69]) and risperidone (HR, 0.38 [95% CI, 0.18-0.82]) were associated with decreased mortality risk.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this prognostic study, an ML-based model was developed and validated to predict mortality risk in FEP. These findings may help to develop personalized interventions to mitigate mortality risk in FEP.

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3