Institutional and Regional Variation in Opioid Prescribing for Hospitalized Infants in the US

Author:

Keane Olivia A.1,Ourshalimian Shadassa1,Lakshmanan Ashwini2,Lee Henry C.3,Hintz Susan R.4,Nguyen Nam15,Ing Madeleine C.1,Gong Cynthia L.6,Kaplan Cameron7,Kelley-Quon Lorraine I.189

Affiliation:

1. Division of Pediatric Surgery, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California

2. Department of Health Systems Science, Bernard J. Tyson Kaiser Permanente School of Medicine, Pasadena, California

3. Division of Neonatology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla

4. Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Palo Alto, California

5. Division of Pediatric Surgery, Memorial Care Miller Children’s & Women’s Hospital, Long Beach, California

6. Fetal and Neonatal Institute, Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles

7. USC Gehr Family Center for Health Systems Science and Innovation, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles

8. Department of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles

9. Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles

Abstract

ImportanceHigh-risk infants, defined as newborns with substantial neonatal-perinatal morbidities, often undergo multiple procedures and require prolonged intubation, resulting in extended opioid exposure that is associated with poor outcomes. Understanding variation in opioid prescribing can inform quality improvement and best-practice initiatives.ObjectiveTo examine regional and institutional variation in opioid prescribing, including short- and long-acting agents, in high-risk hospitalized infants.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis retrospective cohort study assessed high-risk infants younger than 1 year from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2022, at 47 children’s hospitals participating in the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS). The cohort was stratified by US Census region (Northeast, South, Midwest, and West). Variation in cumulative days of opioid exposure and methadone treatment was examined among institutions using a hierarchical generalized linear model. High-risk infants were identified by International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision codes for congenital heart disease surgery, medical and surgical necrotizing enterocolitis, extremely low birth weight, very low birth weight, hypoxemic ischemic encephalopathy, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and other abdominal surgery. Infants with neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome, in utero substance exposure, or malignant tumors were excluded.ExposureAny opioid exposure and methadone treatment.Main Outcomes and MeasuresRegional and institutional variations in opioid exposure.ResultsOverall, 132 658 high-risk infants were identified (median [IQR] gestational age, 34 [28-38] weeks; 54.5% male). Prematurity occurred in 30.3%, and 55.3% underwent surgery. During hospitalization, 76.5% of high-risk infants were exposed to opioids and 7.9% received methadone. Median (IQR) length of any opioid exposure was 5 (2-12) cumulative days, and median (IQR) length of methadone treatment was 19 (7-46) cumulative days. There was significant hospital-level variation in opioid and methadone exposure and cumulative days of exposure within each US region. The computed intraclass correlation coefficient estimated that 16% of the variability in overall opioid prescribing and 20% of the variability in methadone treatment was attributed to the individual hospital.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this retrospective cohort study of high-risk hospitalized infants, institution-level variation in overall opioid exposure and methadone treatment persisted across the US. These findings highlight the need for standardization of opioid prescribing in this vulnerable population.

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3