Disparities in Survival Due to Social Determinants of Health and Access to Treatment in US Patients With Operable Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma

Author:

Alnajar Ahmed1,Kareff Samuel A.23,Razi Syed S.4,Rao J. Sunil5,De Lima Lopes Gilberto6,Nguyen Dao M.1,Villamizar Nestor1,Rodriguez Estelamari7

Affiliation:

1. Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Miami Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida

2. Jackson Memorial Hospital, University of Miami Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida

3. Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida

4. Division of Thoracic Surgery, Memorial Healthcare System, Hollywood, Florida

5. Division of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida

6. Department of Medical Oncology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, Florida

7. Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Miami Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida

Abstract

ImportanceOutcomes of localized malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) remain poor despite multimodality therapy. It is unclear what role disparities have in the overall survival (OS) of patients with operable MPM.ObjectiveTo examine survival disparities associated with social determinants of health (SDOHs) and treatment access in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsIn this observational, retrospective cohort study, patients with MPM diagnosed between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2017, were identified from the National Cancer Database with a maximum follow-up time of 13.6 years. The analysis was conducted from February 16, 2022, to July 29, 2022. Patients were included if they were diagnosed with potentially resectable clinical stage I to IIIA MPM, had epithelioid and biphasic histologic subtypes, and received chemotherapy. Patients were excluded if they could not receive curative surgery, were 75 years or older, or had metastasis, unknown stage, or tumor extension to the chest wall, mediastinal tissues, or organs.ExposuresChemotherapy alone vs chemotherapy with curative surgery in the form of pleurectomy and decortication or extrapleural pneumonectomy.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary end point was OS. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to determine hazard ratios (HRs) for OS, including univariable and multivariable models controlling for potential confounders, including demographic, comorbidity, clinical, treatment, tumor, and hospital-related variables, as well as SDOHs.ResultsA total of 1389 patients with MPM were identified (median [IQR] age, 66 [61-70] years; 1024 [74%] male; 12 [1%] Asian, 49 [3%] Black, 74 [5%] Hispanic, 1233 [89%] White, and 21 [2%] of other race). The median OS was 1.7 years (95% CI, 1.6-1.8). Risk factors associated with worse OS included older age, male sex, Black race, low income, and low educational attainment. Factors associated with greater odds of survival included receipt of surgical therapy, recent year of treatment, increased distance to travel, and treatment at high-volume academic hospitals. The risk factors most strongly associated with poor OS included Black race (HR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.43-2.69) and male sex (HR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.38-1.86). Surgical treatment in addition to systemic chemotherapy (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.61-0.81) was independently associated with improved OS, as were chemotherapy initiation (HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.87-0.99) and greater travel distance from the hospital (HR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.86-0.98).Conclusions and RelevanceIn this retrospective cohort study of patients with operable MPM, there was significant variability in access to care by SDOHs. Addressing disparities in access to multimodality therapy can help ensure equity of care for patients with MPM.

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Subject

General Medicine

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3