Physicians’ Perceptions of Clinical Decision Support to Treat Patients With Heart Failure in the ED

Author:

Casey Scott D.12,Reed Mary E.12,LeMaster Chris3,Mark Dustin G.3,Gaskin Jesse4,Norris Robert P.5,Sax Dana R.123

Affiliation:

1. Kaiser Permanente Division of Research, Oakland, California

2. The Kaiser Permanente CREST Network, Oakland, California

3. The Permanente Medical Group, Oakland, California

4. The Permanente Medical Group Consulting Services, The Permanente Medical Group, Oakland, California

5. The Permanente Medical Group, Sacramento, California

Abstract

ImportanceClinical decision support (CDS) could help emergency department (ED) physicians treat patients with heart failure (HF) by estimating risk, collating relevant history, and assisting with medication prescribing if physicians’ perspectives inform its design and implementation.ObjectiveTo evaluate CDS usability and workflow integration in the hands of ED physician end users who use it in clinical practice.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis mixed-methods qualitative study administered semistructured interviews to ED physicians from 2 community EDs of Kaiser Permanente Northern California in 2023. The interview guide, based on the Usability Heuristics for User Interface Design and the Sociotechnical Environment models, yielded themes used to construct an electronic survey instrument sent to all ED physicians.Main Outcomes and MeasuresMain outcomes were physicians’ perceptions of using CDS to complement clinical decision-making, usability, and integration into ED clinical workflow.ResultsSeven key informant physicians (5 [71.4%] female, median [IQR] 15.0 [9.5-15.0] years in practice) were interviewed and survey responses from 51 physicians (23 [45.1%] female, median [IQR] 14.0 [9.5-17.0] years in practice) were received from EDs piloting the CDS intervention. Response rate was 67.1% (51 of 76). Physicians suggested changes to CDS accessibility, functionality, and workflow integration. Most agreed that CDS would improve patient care and fewer than half of physicians expressed hesitation about their capacity to consistently comply with its recommendations, citing workload concerns. Physicians preferred a passive prompt that encouraged, but did not mandate, interaction with the CDS.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this qualitative study of physicians who were using a novel CDS intervention to assist with ED management of patients with acute HF, several opportunities were identified to improve usability as well as several key barriers and facilitators to CDS implementation.

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3