Chatbot vs Medical Student Performance on Free-Response Clinical Reasoning Examinations-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Chatbot vs Medical Student Performance on Free-Response Clinical Reasoning Examinations

Published:2023-09-01 Issue:9 Volume:183 Page:1028
ISSN:2168-6106
Container-title:JAMA Internal Medicine
language:en
Short-container-title:JAMA Intern Med

Author:

Strong Eric¹,DiGiammarino Alicia²,Weng Yingjie³,Kumar Andre¹,Hosamani Poonam¹,Hom Jason¹,Chen Jonathan H.¹⁴⁵

Affiliation:

1. Division of Hospital Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California

2. Office of Medical Education, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California

3. Quantitative Sciences Unit, Stanford University, Stanford, California

4. Stanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California

5. Clinical Excellence Research Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California

Abstract

This study compares performance on free-response clinical reasoning examinations of first- and second-year medical students vs 2 models of a popular chatbot.

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Subject

Internal Medicine

Link

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/articlepdf/2806980/jamainternal_strong_2023_ld_230023_1693517126.00366.pdf

Reference4 articles.

1. Benefits, limits, and risks of GPT-4 as an AI chatbot for medicine.;Lee;N Engl J Med,2023

2. Open AI. ChatGPT: optimizing language models for dialogue. OpenAI. Published November 30, 2022. Accessed February 1, 2023. https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt/

3. Nori? H, King? N, McKinney? SM, . Capabilities of GPT-4 on medical challenge problems. arXiv. Preprint posted online March 20, 2023. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2303.13375

4. American Board of Internal Medicine. Doctors maintaining ABIM board certification will soon be able to access an electronic resource they use in practice during periodic knowledge assessments. September 27, 2017. Accessed February 2, 2023. https://www.abim.org/media-center/press-releases/abim-open-book-assessments-will-feature-access-to-uptodate.aspx.

Cited by 54 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. ChatGPT Use Among Pediatric Health Care Providers: Cross-Sectional Survey Study;JMIR Formative Research;2024-09-12

2. Chatbots in neurology and neuroscience: Interactions with students, patients and neurologists;Brain Disorders;2024-09

3. Evaluating the Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence-Based Chatbots on Pediatric Dentistry Questions in the Korean National Dental Board Exam;THE JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN ACADEMY OF PEDTATRIC DENTISTRY;2024-08-31

4. Influence of Model Evolution and System Roles on ChatGPT’s Performance in Chinese Medical Licensing Exams: Comparative Study;JMIR Medical Education;2024-08-13

5. Scoring story recall for individual differences research: Central details, peripheral details, and automated scoring;Behavior Research Methods;2024-08-07