Affiliation:
1. Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison
2. Department of Surgery, Wisconsin Surgical Outcomes Research Program, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison
3. Department of Otolaryngology, State University of New York, Syracuse, New York
4. Department of Surgery, Division of Endocrine Surgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison
5. Ebling Library for the Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison
6. Division of Otolaryngology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison
Abstract
ImportancePapillary thyroid microcarcinomas (PTMCs) have been associated with increased thyroid cancer incidence in recent decades. Total thyroidectomy (TT) has historically been the primary treatment, but current guidelines recommend hemithyroidectomy (HT) for select low-risk cancers; however, the risk-benefit ratio of the 2 operations is incompletely characterized.ObjectiveTo compare surgical complication rates between TT and HT for PTMC treatment.Data SourcesSCOPUS, Medline via the PubMed interface, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); through January 1, 2021, with no starting date restriction. Terms related to papillary thyroid carcinoma and its treatment were used for article retrieval. This meta-analysis used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guideline and was written according to the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) proposal.Study SelectionOriginal investigations of adults reporting primary surgical treatment outcomes in PTMC and at least 1 complication of interest were included. Articles evaluating only secondary operations or non–open surgical approaches were excluded. Study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were performed by 2 independent reviewers and conflicts resolved by a senior reviewer.Data Extraction and SynthesisPooled effect estimates were calculated using a random-effects inverse-variance weighting model. Studies that directly compared outcomes between HT and TT were considered in a weighted meta-analysis for determination of effect sizes.Main Outcomes and MeasuresCancer recurrence and site, mortality (all-cause and disease-specific), vocal fold paralysis, hypoparathyroidism, and hemorrhage/hematoma. Risk of bias was assessed using the McMaster Quality Assessment Scale of Harms scale.ResultsIn this systematic review and meta-analysis, 17 studies were analyzed and included 1416 patients undergoing HT and 2411 patients undergoing TT (HT: pooled mean [SD] age, 47.0 [10.0] years; 1139 [84.6%] were female; and TT: pooled mean [SD] age, 48.8 [10.0] years; 1671 [77.4%] were female). Five studies directly compared outcomes between HT and TT, 5 reported solely on HT outcomes, and 7 reported solely on TT outcomes. Patients undergoing HT had significantly lower risk of temporary vocal fold paralysis compared with patients undergoing TT (2.0% vs 4.2%) (weighted risk ratio [RR], 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2-0.7), temporary hypoparathyroidism (2.2% vs 21.3%) (weighted RR, 0.1; 95% CI, 0.0-0.4), and permanent hypoparathyroidism (0% vs 1.8%) (weighted RR, 0.2; 95% CI, 0.0-0.8). Contralateral lobe malignant neoplasm recurrence was 2.4% in the HT group, while no such events occurred in the TT group. Hemithyroidectomy was associated with a higher overall recurrence rate compared with TT (3.9% vs 1.3%) (weighted RR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.4-5.7), but there was no difference in recurrence in the thyroid bed or neck.Conclusions and RelevanceThe results of this systematic review and meta-analysis help characterize current knowledge of the risk-benefit ratio of HT vs TT for treatment of PTMC and provide data that may have utility for patient counseling surrounding treatment decisions.
Publisher
American Medical Association (AMA)
Subject
Otorhinolaryngology,Surgery