Complication Rates of Total Thyroidectomy vs Hemithyroidectomy for Treatment of Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma

Author:

Hsiao Vivian1,Light Tyler J.12,Adil Abdullah A.1,Tao Michael3,Chiu Alexander S.14,Hitchcock Mary5,Arroyo Natalia12,Fernandes-Taylor Sara12,Francis David O.126

Affiliation:

1. Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison

2. Department of Surgery, Wisconsin Surgical Outcomes Research Program, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison

3. Department of Otolaryngology, State University of New York, Syracuse, New York

4. Department of Surgery, Division of Endocrine Surgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison

5. Ebling Library for the Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison

6. Division of Otolaryngology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison

Abstract

ImportancePapillary thyroid microcarcinomas (PTMCs) have been associated with increased thyroid cancer incidence in recent decades. Total thyroidectomy (TT) has historically been the primary treatment, but current guidelines recommend hemithyroidectomy (HT) for select low-risk cancers; however, the risk-benefit ratio of the 2 operations is incompletely characterized.ObjectiveTo compare surgical complication rates between TT and HT for PTMC treatment.Data SourcesSCOPUS, Medline via the PubMed interface, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); through January 1, 2021, with no starting date restriction. Terms related to papillary thyroid carcinoma and its treatment were used for article retrieval. This meta-analysis used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guideline and was written according to the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) proposal.Study SelectionOriginal investigations of adults reporting primary surgical treatment outcomes in PTMC and at least 1 complication of interest were included. Articles evaluating only secondary operations or non–open surgical approaches were excluded. Study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were performed by 2 independent reviewers and conflicts resolved by a senior reviewer.Data Extraction and SynthesisPooled effect estimates were calculated using a random-effects inverse-variance weighting model. Studies that directly compared outcomes between HT and TT were considered in a weighted meta-analysis for determination of effect sizes.Main Outcomes and MeasuresCancer recurrence and site, mortality (all-cause and disease-specific), vocal fold paralysis, hypoparathyroidism, and hemorrhage/hematoma. Risk of bias was assessed using the McMaster Quality Assessment Scale of Harms scale.ResultsIn this systematic review and meta-analysis, 17 studies were analyzed and included 1416 patients undergoing HT and 2411 patients undergoing TT (HT: pooled mean [SD] age, 47.0 [10.0] years; 1139 [84.6%] were female; and TT: pooled mean [SD] age, 48.8 [10.0] years; 1671 [77.4%] were female). Five studies directly compared outcomes between HT and TT, 5 reported solely on HT outcomes, and 7 reported solely on TT outcomes. Patients undergoing HT had significantly lower risk of temporary vocal fold paralysis compared with patients undergoing TT (2.0% vs 4.2%) (weighted risk ratio [RR], 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2-0.7), temporary hypoparathyroidism (2.2% vs 21.3%) (weighted RR, 0.1; 95% CI, 0.0-0.4), and permanent hypoparathyroidism (0% vs 1.8%) (weighted RR, 0.2; 95% CI, 0.0-0.8). Contralateral lobe malignant neoplasm recurrence was 2.4% in the HT group, while no such events occurred in the TT group. Hemithyroidectomy was associated with a higher overall recurrence rate compared with TT (3.9% vs 1.3%) (weighted RR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.4-5.7), but there was no difference in recurrence in the thyroid bed or neck.Conclusions and RelevanceThe results of this systematic review and meta-analysis help characterize current knowledge of the risk-benefit ratio of HT vs TT for treatment of PTMC and provide data that may have utility for patient counseling surrounding treatment decisions.

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Subject

Otorhinolaryngology,Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3