Prolonged vs Intermittent Infusions of β-Lactam Antibiotics in Adults With Sepsis or Septic Shock

Author:

Abdul-Aziz Mohd H.1,Hammond Naomi E.23,Brett Stephen J.4,Cotta Menino O.1,De Waele Jan J.5,Devaux Anthony6,Di Tanna Gian Luca678,Dulhunty Joel M.291011,Elkady Hatem12,Eriksson Lars13,Hasan M. Shahnaz14,Khan Ayesha Bibi15,Lipman Jeffrey191617,Liu Xiaoqiu618,Monti Giacomo1920,Myburgh John221,Novy Emmanuel2223,Omar Shahed15,Rajbhandari Dorrilyn2,Roger Claire2425,Sjövall Fredrik2627,Zaghi Irene28,Zangrillo Alberto1920,Delaney Anthony23,Roberts Jason A.191729

Affiliation:

1. University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research (UQCCR), Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

2. Critical Care Program, The George Institute for Global Health and University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

3. Malcolm Fisher Department of Intensive Care, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

4. Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom

5. Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium

6. Statistics Division, The George Institute for Global Health and University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

7. Department of Business Economics, Health and Social Care, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland, Manno, Switzerland

8. Department of Clinical Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland

9. Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

10. Redcliffe Hospital, Redcliffe, Queensland, Australia

11. Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

12. Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

13. UQ Library, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

14. Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, University Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

15. Division of Critical Care, University of Witwatersrand, Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital, Johannesburg, South Africa

16. Jamieson Trauma Institute, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

17. Division of Anesthesiology Critical Care Emergency and Pain Medicine, Nîmes University Hospital, University of Montpellier, Nîmes, France

18. School of Population Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

19. Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy

20. Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy

21. Department of Intensive Care, St George Hospital, Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia

22. Service d’anesthésie-réanimation et médicine péri-opératoire Brabois adulte, CHRU de Nancy, Nancy, France

23. Université de Lorraine, SIMPA, Nancy, France

24. Département d’anesthésie et réanimation, douleur et médecine d’urgence, CHU Carémeau, Nîmes, France

25. UR UM 103IMAGINE, Faculté de Médecine, Montpellier Université, Nîmes, France

26. Intensive and Perioperative Care, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden

27. Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden

28. Department of Diagnostic and Experimental Medicine, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy

29. Herston Infectious Diseases Institute (HeIDI), Metro North Health, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Abstract

ImportanceThere is uncertainty about whether prolonged infusions of β-lactam antibiotics improve clinically important outcomes in critically ill adults with sepsis or septic shock.ObjectiveTo determine whether prolonged β-lactam antibiotic infusions are associated with a reduced risk of death in critically ill adults with sepsis or septic shock compared with intermittent infusions.Data SourcesThe primary search was conducted with MEDLINE (via PubMed), CINAHL, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to May 2, 2024.Study SelectionRandomized clinical trials comparing prolonged (continuous or extended) and intermittent infusions of β-lactam antibiotics in critically ill adults with sepsis or septic shock.Data Extraction and SynthesisData extraction and risk of bias were assessed independently by 2 reviewers. Certainty of evidence was evaluated with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. A bayesian framework was used as the primary analysis approach and a frequentist framework as the secondary approach.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was all-cause 90-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included intensive care unit (ICU) mortality and clinical cure.ResultsFrom 18 eligible randomized clinical trials that included 9108 critically ill adults with sepsis or septic shock (median age, 54 years; IQR, 48-57; 5961 men [65%]), 17 trials (9014 participants) contributed data to the primary outcome. The pooled estimated risk ratio for all-cause 90-day mortality for prolonged infusions of β-lactam antibiotics compared with intermittent infusions was 0.86 (95% credible interval, 0.72-0.98; I2 = 21.5%; high certainty), with a 99.1% posterior probability that prolonged infusions were associated with lower 90-day mortality. Prolonged infusion of β-lactam antibiotics was associated with a reduced risk of intensive care unit mortality (risk ratio, 0.84; 95% credible interval, 0.70-0.97; high certainty) and an increase in clinical cure (risk ratio, 1.16; 95% credible interval, 1.07-1.31; moderate certainty).Conclusions and RelevanceAmong adults in the intensive care unit who had sepsis or septic shock, the use of prolonged β-lactam antibiotic infusions was associated with a reduced risk of 90-day mortality compared with intermittent infusions. The current evidence presents a high degree of certainty for clinicians to consider prolonged infusions as a standard of care in the management of sepsis and septic shock.Trial RegistrationPROSPERO Identifier: CRD42023399434

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3