Medicare-Covered Services Near the End of Life in Medicare Advantage vs Traditional Medicare

Author:

Nicholas Lauren Hersch1,Fischer Stacy M.1,Arbaje Alicia I.2,Perraillon Marcelo Coca3,Jones Christine D.45,Polsky Daniel6

Affiliation:

1. University of Colorado Medical School, Aurora

2. Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public, Baltimore, Maryland

3. Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora

4. Division of Hospital Medicine and Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora

5. Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado

6. Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland

Abstract

ImportanceFinancial incentives in Medicare Advantage (MA), the managed care alternative to traditional Medicare (TM), were designed to reduce overutilization. For patients near the end of life (EOL), MA incentives may reduce potentially burdensome care and encourage hospice but could also restrict access to costly but necessary services.ObjectiveTo compare receipt of potentially burdensome treatments and transfers and potentially necessary postacute services in the last 6 months of life in individuals with MA vs TM.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsA retrospective analysis of Medicare claims data among older Medicare beneficiaries who died between 2016 and 2018. The study included Medicare decedents aged 66 years or older covered by TM (n = 659 135) or MA (n = 360 430). All decedents and the subset of decedents with 1 or more emergent hospitalizations with a life-limiting condition (cancer, dementia, end-stage organ failure) that would likely qualify for hospice care were included.ExposureMA enrollment.Main OutcomesReceipt of potentially burdensome hospitalizations and treatments; receipt of postdischarge home and facility care.ResultsThe study included 659 135 TM enrollees (mean [SD] age at death, 83.3 [9.0] years, 54% female, 15.1% non-White, 55% with 1 or more life-limiting condition) and 360 430 MA enrollees (mean [SD] age at death 82.5 [8.7] years, 53% female, 19.3% non-White, 49% with 1 or more life-limiting condition). After regression adjustment, MA enrollees were less likely to receive potentially burdensome treatments (−1.6 percentage points (pp); 95% CI, −2.1 to −1.1) and less likely to die in a hospital (−3.3 pp; 95% CI, −4.0 to −2.7) compared with TM. However, when hospitalized, MA enrollees were more likely to die in the hospital (adjusted difference, 1.3 pp; 95% CI, 1.1-1.5) and less likely to be transferred to rehabilitative or skilled nursing facilities (−5.2 pp; 95% CI, −5.7 to −4.6). Higher rates of home health and home hospice among those discharged home offset half of the decline in facility use. Results were unchanged in the life-limiting conditions sample.ConclusionsMA enrollment was associated with lower rates of potentially burdensome and facility-based care near the EOL. Greater use of home-based care may improve quality of care but may also leave patients without adequate assistance after hospitalization.

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3