Health Care Expenditures for Black and White US Adults Living Under Similar Conditions

Author:

Dean Lorraine T.12,Zhang Yuehan13,McCleary Rachael R.24,Dawit Rahel1,Thorpe Roland J.256,Gaskin Darrell24

Affiliation:

1. Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland

2. Johns Hopkins Center for Health Disparities Solutions, Baltimore, Maryland

3. Analysis Group Inc, New York, New York

4. Department of Health Policy & Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland

5. Johns Hopkins Alzheimer’s Disease Resource Center for Minority Aging Research, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland

6. Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland

Abstract

ImportanceEvidence suggests that racial disparities in health outcomes disappear or diminish when Black and White adults in the US live under comparable living conditions; however, whether racial disparities in health care expenditures concomitantly disappear or diminish is unknown.ObjectiveTo examine whether disparities in health care expenditures are minimized when Black and White US adults live in similar areas of racial composition and economic condition.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cross-sectional study used a nationally representative sample of 7062 non-Hispanic Black or White adults who live in 2238 of 2275 US census tracts with a 5% or greater Black population and who participated in the Medical Expenditure Panel Study (MEPS) in 2016. Differences in total health care expenditures and 6 specific categories of health care expenditures were assessed. Two-part regression models compared expenditures between Black and White adults living in the same Index of Concentration at the Extremes (ICE) quintile, a measure of racialized economic segregation. Estimated dollar amount differences in expenditures were calculated. All analyses were weighted to account for the complex sampling design of the MEPS. Data analysis was performed from December 1, 2019, to August 7, 2023.ExposureSelf-reported non-Hispanic Black or non-Hispanic White race.Main Outcomes and MeasuresPresence and amount of patient out-of-pocket and insurance payments for annual total health care expenditures; office-based, outpatient, emergency department, inpatient hospital, or dental visits; and prescription medicines. ICE quintile 5 (Q5) reflected tracts that were mostly high income with mostly White individuals, whereas Q1 reflected tracts that were mostly low income with mostly Black individuals.ResultsA total of 7062 MEPS respondents (mean [SD] age, 49 [18] years; 33.1% Black and 66.9% White; 56.1% female and 43.9% male) who lived in census tracts with a 5% or greater Black population in 2016 were studied. In Q5, Black adults had 56% reduced odds of having any health care expenditures (odds ratio, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.27-0.71) compared with White adults, at an estimated $2145 less per year, despite similar health status. Among those in Q5 with any expenditures, Black adults spent 30% less on care (cost ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.56-0.86). In Q3 (most racially and economically integrated), differences in total annual health care spending were minimal ($79 annually; 95% CI, −$1187 to $1345).Conclusions and RelevanceIn this cross-sectional study of Black and White adults in the US, health care expenditure disparities diminished or disappeared under conditions of both racial and economic equity and equitable health care access; in areas that were mostly high income and had mostly White residents, Black adults spent substantially less. Results underscore the continuing need to recognize place as a contributor to race-based differences in health care spending.

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy

Reference20 articles.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3