Cytotoxicity and Degree of Conversion of Orthodontic Adhesives

Author:

Jagdish Nithya1,Padmanabhan Sridevi23,Chitharanjan Arun B.4,Revathi J.5,Palani Gunasekaran6,Sambasivam Mohana7,Sheriff Khaleefathullah8,Saravanamurali K.9

Affiliation:

1. a Lecturer, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Sri Ramachandra Dental College & Hospital, Sri Ramachandra University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

2. b Professor, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Sri Ramachandra Dental College & Hospital, Sri Ramachandra University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

3. Corresponding author: Dr Sridevi Padmanabhan, Professor, Department of Orthodontics, Sri Ramachandra Dental College & Hospital, Sri Ramachandra University, Porur 600116, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India (sridevipadu@gmail.com)

4. c Professor and Department Head, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Sri Ramachandra Dental College & Hospital, Sri Ramachandra University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

5. d Director, King Institute of Preventive Medicine, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

6. e Professor and Department Head, Department of Virology, King Institute of Preventive Medicine, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

7. f Assistant Professor, Department of Virology, King Institute of Preventive Medicine, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

8. g Research Scientist, Department of Virology, King Institute of Preventive Medicine, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

9. h Research Assistant, Department of Virology, King Institute of Preventive Medicine, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

Abstract

Abstract Objectives: To test the hypothesis that there is no difference in the cytotoxicity related to the modes of polymerization of five commercially available orthodontic bonding resins, with and without an oxygen-inhibited layer (OIL), and to evaluate the degree of conversion (DC) of these resins and correlate this to cytotoxicity. Materials and Methods: Five commercially available orthodontic bonding resins were tested for cytotoxicity and DC. Thirty-six disks of standardized dimensions, for each resin, were used for cytotoxicity assessment. Half of them were washed with 99% acetone to remove the OIL (washed resins), and the remaining disks were left intact (intact resins). Glass disks were used as a control. Vero cells were exposed to intact and washed resins on day 1. Cell viability was determined by tetrazolium bromide reduction assay 1, 3, and 6 days after exposure. The DC of the adhesive specimens of each resin, prepared with a procedure identical to the clinical bonding process, was assessed by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Results: Single-cured systems were comparatively less cytotoxic than dual-cured systems. With removal of the OIL, increased cell viability was noted only with two resins on all three days. Resins tested showed differences in DC. A positive correlation was demonstrated by two resins. Conclusion: The hypothesis is rejected. Single-cured systems are superior to dual-cured systems in exhibiting comparatively less toxicity and higher DC. A significant positive correlation was not established between cytotoxicity and DC.

Publisher

The Angle Orthodontist (EH Angle Education & Research Foundation)

Subject

Orthodontics

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3