Abstract
Commercial content moderation removes harassment, abuse, hate, or any material deemed harmful or offensive from user-generated content platforms. A platform’s content policy and related government regulations are forms of explicit language policy. This kind of policy dictates the classifications of harmful language and aims to change users’ language practices by force. However, the de facto language policy is the actual practice of language moderation by algorithms and humans. Algorithms and human moderators enforce which words (and thereby, content) can be shared, revealing the normative values of hateful, offensive, or free speech and shaping how users adapt and create new language practices. This paper will introduce the process and challenges of commercial content moderation, as well as Canada’s proposed Bill C-36 with its complementary regulatory framework, and briefly discuss the implications for language practices.
Publisher
York University Libraries
Reference62 articles.
1. Abid, A., Farooqi, M., & Zou, J. (2021). Large language models associate Muslims with violence. Nature Machine Intelligence, 3(6), 461–463. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-021-00359-2
2. Andrews, L. (2020, August 31). Paedophiles are using cheese and pizza emojis to communicate secretly on Instagram. Daily Mail Online. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8681535/Paedophiles-using-cheese-pizza-emojis-communicate-secretly-Instagram.html
3. Bayer, J., & Bárd, P. (2020). Hate speech and hate crime in the EU and the evaluation of online content regulation approaches (PE655.135 - July 2020). European Parliament’s Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2020/655135/IPOL_STU(2020)655135_EN.pdf
4. Bender, E., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., Shmitchell, S., & Anonymous. (2020). On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, 1(1), 271–278. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445922
5. Benjamin, R. (2019). Race after technology: Abolitionist tools for the new Jim code. Polity.