Estimating the Maximum Magnitude of Induced Earthquakes in the Groningen Gas Field, the Netherlands

Author:

Bommer Julian J.1ORCID,van Elk Jan2,Zoback Mark D.3

Affiliation:

1. 1Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom

2. 2Nederlandse Aardolie Maatschappij B.V. (NAM), Assen, The Netherlands

3. 3Department of Geophysics (Emeritus), Stanford University, Stanford, California, U.S.A.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Gas production in the Groningen field in the northern Netherlands began in 1963. Since 1991, many production-induced earthquakes have occurred—the largest reaching magnitude M 3.5 in 2012. In October 2023, the Dutch government closed the field—a decision that was justified by the potential threat of larger earthquakes occurring with continued gas extraction. This outcome highlights how the estimation of maximum magnitude for induced earthquakes can have important implications for risk perception by regulators and the public. Thus, the estimation of maximum magnitude for induced earthquakes that are not physically realizable can lead to unwarranted conservatism. Over almost three decades, considerable effort has been invested by several researchers to estimate the maximum magnitude of induced earthquakes in Groningen. These efforts culminated in international workshops focusing exclusively on this question in 2016 and 2022. The purpose of these workshops was to inform the decision-making of an expert panel charged with formulating a logic tree for the maximum magnitude of Groningen earthquakes. We argue that the evaluation of the final distribution of maximum magnitudes is overly conservative in terms of the largest events induced in the reservoir and, most importantly, the likelihood of triggering even larger tectonic earthquakes outside the gas-producing reservoir. Given the serious and far-reaching consequences of maximum magnitude estimates, we reconsider the approach of these assessments to draw lessons that may be critical for future energy-related projects associated with induced seismicity.

Publisher

Seismological Society of America (SSA)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3