Abstract
U.S. Catholics in recent decades have been given the choice between Republicans and Democrats, representing two parties whose platforms diverge significantly from Catholic social teaching (CST). The American Solidarity Party (ASP) was founded on the same principles as CST, particularly consistent respect for the dignity of human life, including safeguards and support for the poor, vulnerable, and oppressed. Thus, it offers U.S. Catholic voters, as well as many other constituencies, an alternative that can greatly reduce their cognitive dissonance regarding CST in the voting process. However, this reduction in cognitive dissonance is balanced by the low probability of immediate electoral success. 71 ASP supporters were interviewed at length to ascertain why they support the party, how they view the party’s internal dynamics, and what they hope to see the party achieve. The ASP attracts supporters committed to upholding human dignity. While members appreciate having finally a found a political home that respects their commitment, their characteristically principled stances often discord with other supporters’ stances. They have developed novel strategies, perhaps shaped by their Christian Democratic ideologies, to navigate their differences to form a united front as they strive to promote, in conventional and unconventional ways, greater protection for human dignity.
Publisher
Center for Study of Religion and Religious Tolerance
Reference38 articles.
1. Abramowitz Alan I., and Kyle L. Saunders, Exploring the Bases of Partisanship in the American Electorate: Social Identity vs. Ideology, Political Research Quarterly, Vol. 59, No. 2, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290605900201
2. Antkowiak Laura S., Levi G. Allen, and Geoffrey C. Layman, Coping with Cross-Pressures: The Seamless Garment in Catholic Political Behavior, Advances in Political Psychology, Vol. 42, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12796
3. Best Robin E., and Steve B. Lem, Electoral Volatility, Competition and Third-party Candidacies in US Gubernatorial Elections, Party Politics, Vol. 17, No. 5, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068810376181
4. Bole William, “Communitarian Lite”, in: American Catholics & Civic Engagement: A Distinctive Voice, Margaret O’Brien Steinfels (ed.), Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, 2004.
5. Borghesi, Massimo, Catholic Discordance: Neoconservatism vs. the Field Hospital Church of Pope Francis, Liturgical Press, Collegeville, 2021.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献