Abstract
Abstract
Previous investigations have demonstrated FN400 and LPC, 2 event-related potential old/new effects that respectively reflect familiarity- and recollection-based processes in memory. However, it is unclear whether these effects are susceptible to processing fluency, particularly different types of processing fluency. To address this issue, applying a masked priming paradigm, we conducted an event-related potential experiment by manipulating semantic relations between the prime and the target as identical (reflecting perceptual fluency), thematically and taxonomically related (referring to conceptual fluency), and unrelated. A remember/know (R/K) judgment task in the test phase was used to distinguish familiarity- and recollection-based processes. Behaviorally, both task performance and response speed were modulated by the variables of priming condition, item type, and response type. All 4 priming conditions elicited significant FN400 and LPC. Compared with the K response, the R response was more relevant to the recollection-based processes reflected by LPC. Both FN400 and LPC were modulated by whether there was a response of R, K, or new. The former was susceptible only to conceptual fluency, and the latter was sensitive to both perceptual fluency and conceptual fluency, which offered telling evidence for the dual process model. Considerations for future investigations are proposed. See supplemental materials here: https://www.press.uillinois.edu/journals/ajp/media/evidence_in_remember_know_paradigm/
Publisher
University of Illinois Press
Subject
Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Developmental and Educational Psychology,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
Reference61 articles.
1. 1. To examine whether our data analysis was appropriate, we also applied the normal time windows of 300-500 and 500-800 ms for FN400 and LPC, respectively. The data are shown in the supplemental file.
2. Bader, R., & Mecklinger, A. (2017). Separating event-related potential effects for conceptual fluency and episodic familiarity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 29, 1402-1414. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01131
3. Chen, Q., Li, P., Xi, L., Li, F., Lei, Y., & Li, H. (2013). How do taxonomic versus thematic relations impact similarity and difference judgments? An ERP study. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 90, 135-142. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2013.06.015
4. Curran, T. (1999). The electrophysiology of incidental and intentional retrieval: ERP old/new effects in lexical decision and recognition memory. Neuropsychologia, 37, 771-785. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(98)00133-X
5. Curran, T. (2000). Brain potentials of recollection and familiarity. Memory & Cognition, 28, 923-938. doi:10.3758/BF03209340
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献