Assessing the Psychometric Properties of Students’ MOOC-Efficacy Measurement Model

Author:

Ghazali Norliza,Mustakim Siti Salina,Nordin Mohamad Sahari,Hashim Sulaiman

Abstract

Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) have been identified as a potential innovation for improving teaching and learning. This research aims to develop and evaluate a measurement model of students’ MOOC-efficacy. The study conceptualized students’ MOOC-efficacy in four dimensions of information searching, making queries, MOOC learning, and MOOC usability. Data were collected with a 23 items questionnaire whose reliability indexes ranged from 0.822 to 0.890, identified from university students who have had some experience with MOOCs and who willingly volunteered to participate in the research (N=1,524). A sample of 623 respondents was drawn through simple random sampling. The Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was adopted for data analysis. The findings designate that four-dimensional students’ MOOC-efficacy measurement model achieved an acceptable level of fit (RMSEA = 0.061, CFI = 0.935 and a normed chi-square, χ2/df = 3.322). All statistics provide empirical evidence that the students’ MOOC-efficacy measurement model is psychometrically sound in terms of validity and reliability. The measurement model of students’ MOOC-efficacy provides further insights into what works in an open online environment which may be used to fulfill learners’ needs and preferences.

Publisher

Universiti Putra Malaysia

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science

Reference57 articles.

1. Abdul Rahman, A. D., Siti Sarah, J., & Anna Syafira, A. S. (2015). MOOCs at International Islamic University Malaysia. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology Research, 3(2), 140–149.

2. Almahdi, M. E., & Sulfeeza, M. D. (2017). The challenges of massive open online courses (MOOCs) a preliminary review. In J. Zulikha & N. H. Zakaria (Eds.). Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Computing & Informatics (pp. 473-479). School of Computing.

3. American Psychological Association (2014). American Educational Research Association (AERA), & National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME). Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association.

4. Awang, Z. (2015). SEM made simple: A gentle approach to learning structural equation modelling. MPWS Rich Resources.

5. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice Hall.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3