Author:
Jamirsah Nurzuliza,Said Ismail,Jaafar Badrulzaman,Mohd Hassani Mohd Haniff
Abstract
Carbon emissions in Malaysia are escalating due to rapid urbanisation wherein their sources are claimed to be generated by the construction industry, including urban park development. Upon completion of the urban park project, the vegetation will supposedly function immediately as a carbon sequester. However, the processes of building, maintaining, and renewing built features and plantings can emit additional carbon dioxide (CO2) than the storage. Rigorous CO2 release across the maintenance and renewal stages may be contributed by park management activities, such as planting grooming, built feature rectification, and park maintenance works. This study investigated carbon footprint derived from built features and planting works during the construction, maintenance, and renewal stages of park management. Taman Bandaran Kelana Jaya and Taman Aman Petaling Jaya were chosen as the study sites as they were located at urban areas. Continued use of the parks resulted in a swift deterioration of its facilities, whereby this scenario would ensure recurrent maintenance and renewal works were conducted for them. As-built drawings were utilised to identify the lists of inventories and work breakdown structure for every built feature and planting work to approximate the indirect CO2 emissions, which was aided by EToolLCD software. This study revealed that the amount of CO2 sequestered by the manicured vegetation was only 28.7% out of the total CO2 emission produced since its construction stage. Hence, urban parks can be perceived as a carbon source instead of a carbon sink medium.
Publisher
Universiti Putra Malaysia
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science
Reference24 articles.
1. Aleixo, I., Norris, D., Hemerik, L., Barbosa, A., Prata, E., Costa, F., & Poorter, L. (2019). Amazonian rainforest tree mortality driven by climate and functional traits. Nature Climate Change, 9(5), 384-388. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0458-0
2. Alig, R. J., Kline, J. D., & Lichtenstein, M. (2004). Urbanization on the US landscape: looking ahead in the 21st century. Landscape and Urban Planning, 69(2-3), 219-234. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.07.004
3. Almeida, C. M. V. B., Mariano, M. V, Agostinho, F., Liu, G. Y., & Giannetti, B. F. (2018). Exploring the potential of urban park size for the provision of ecosystem services to urban centres : A case study in São Paulo, Brazil. Building and Environment, 144(August), 450-458. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.08.036
4. Arbor Day Foundation. (2020). The basic spacing guide from various distances and various tree heights. Retrieved March 3, 2020, from https://www.arborday.org/trees/rightTreeAndPlace/size.cfm
5. Arellano, G., Medina, N. G., Tan, S., Mohamad, M., & Davies, S. J. (2019). Crown damage and the mortality of tropical trees. New Phytologist, 221(1), 169-179. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.15381
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献