Classification of Types of Interreligious Dialogue

Author:

Melnik S.V.1

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Scientific Information for Social Sciences of the Russian Academy of Sciences (ISISS RAS), Moscow, Russia

Abstract

The existing classifications of types of interreligious dialogue have significant limitations and shortcomings and do not allow us to describe this extremely complex, multi- faceted phenomenon in a systematic and complete way. This paper represents original classification of interreligious dialogue, which overcomes the disadvantages of current research approaches in this area. On the basis of the «intention» criterion, i.e. the motivation that encourages followers of different religions to come into contact with each other, four types of interreligious dialogue are distinguished: polemical, cognitive, peacemaking and partnership. These types of dialogue are lined up respectively around the following questions: Who is right?, Who are you?, How can we live together peacefully? and What can we do to improve the world?. In each of the four types of interreligious dialogue using the criteria goal (i.e. tasks headed towards by the participants in the dialogue); principles i.e. the starting points, which determine the interaction), and form (i.e. participants in the dialogue) various sorts of them are identified and described. For example, the following sorts of cognitive dialogue are considered: theological, spiritual, human (Buberian), truth-seeking dialogue, theology of religions, theology of interreligious dialogue, comparative theology. According to the author, the presented classification allows for the first time to describe different types of interreligious dialogue in a complex, systematic and interrelated way.

Funder

Russian Foundation for Basic Research

Publisher

The Association International Academy of Communicology

Subject

General Medicine

Reference42 articles.

1. Affolderbach M., Bodrov A., Meisner F., Mohagegi H., Renz A. (eds) (2018). Christian-Islamic dialogue. An anthology. Moscow: St. Andrew’s Biblical Theological Institute (In Rus.).

2. Berthrong J. (2013). Christian–Confucian Dialogue. In: The Wiley-Blackwell companion to inter-religious dialogue / Ed. C. Cornill. Chichester. Chichester. P. 296-310.

3. Bethune P.-F. (2013). Monastic inter-religious dialogue. In: The Wiley-Blackwell companion to inter-religious dialogue / Ed. C. Cornill. Chichester. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. P. 34-50.

4. Bormans M. (2000). Two religions: common doctrinal foundations and common ground in various social fields // Khristiane i musul’mane: problemy dialoga / sost. A. V. Zhuravskii. Moscow: Bibleisko-bogoslovskii institut sv. apostola Andreia Publ., P. 533-611 (In Rus.).

5. Catalbaş R. Cetinkaya K. (2015). Interreligious dialogue in the views of Turkish historians of religions // HTS Theological Studies. Durbanville, South Africa. Vol. 71 (3). P. 1-6. DOI: 10.4102/hts.v71i3.2896.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3