Author:
Chandel Aman,Swami Deepak
Abstract
This study deals with review of different improvements done in the formulation of the governing equations to simulate accurate solute transport in saturated porous media over the years. The traditional advection-dispersion equation (ADE) model is the simplest lumped model founded on the assumptions of Fick’s law of diffusion. But it typically underestimates the breakthrough concentration in leading and/or tailing region due to non-fickian transport. It is modified into mobile-immobile model (MIM) considering the medium having micropores with stagnant water pockets but allowing solute exchange by diffusion between mobile and immobile zone which is quantified by mass transfer coefficient. Multi-process non-equilibrium (MPNE) model further simulates for a system with both physical and chemical non-equilibrium by assuming instantaneous and rate-limited sorption in advective and non-advective domains. Using the concept of dual permeability, slow fast transport (SFT) model divides the liquid phase in the domain into three zones i.e. fast, slow and immobile. Here chemical interaction between the fluid and soil matrix takes place only in slow and immobile zones. Non-fickian solute transport does not follow Brownian motion rules so a random variable is required to explain it. Hence continuous time random walk (CTRW) model is used where solute transport is characterized by joint probability variable. Special case of CTRW with solute having considerable probability of moving long distances and follow power law gives Fractional advection-dispersion equation (FADE) model. These models varying from relatively simple to more complex formulations and assumptions are discussed here highlighting the merits and demerits of each.
Publisher
World Energy and Environment Technology Ltd - WEENTECH
Reference110 articles.
1. [1] R. J. Luxmoore, “Micro-, Meso-, and Macroporosity of Soil,” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 671–672, May 1981, doi: 10.2136/sssaj1981.03615995004500030051x.
2. [2] U. Omoti and A. Wild, “Use of fluorescent dyes to mark the pathways of solute movement through soils under leaching conditions: 2. Field experiments,” Soil Sci., vol. 128, no. 2, 1979.
3. [3] G. M. Hornberger, P. F. Germann, and K. J. Beven, “Throughflow and solute transport in an isolated sloping soil block in a forested catchment,” J. Hydrol., vol. 124, no. 1–2, pp. 81–99, Apr. 1991, doi: 10.1016/0022-1694(91)90007-5.
4. [4] P. Germann and K. Beven, “Water flow in soil macropores I. An experimental approach,” J. Soil Sci., vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 1–13, Mar. 1981, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2389.1981.tb01681.x.
5. [5] A. E. Roth, V. Prasnikar, M. Okuno-Fujiwara, and S. Zamir, “Barganing and Market Behavior in Jerusalem, Ljubljana, Pittsburgh, and Tokyo: An Experimental Study,” The American Economic Review, vol. 81, no. 5. pp. 1068–1095, 1991.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献