Evaluation of the growth of maize in monoculture and when associated with peanuts and cassava in the Colombian Amazon
-
Published:2023-08-14
Issue:2
Volume:41
Page:e107281
-
ISSN:2357-3732
-
Container-title:Agronomía Colombiana
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:Agron. Colomb.
Author:
Sánchez Olaya Diana MaríaORCID, Romero Ospina Manuel FranciscoORCID, Sandoval Rodríguez WilsonORCID, Rivera Ramírez Karen TatianaORCID, Suaza García Eliana LisethORCID
Abstract
Crop associations are widely recognized as a highly beneficial strategy for agriculture. By combining different crops, optimal production is achieved while minimizing the spread of pests and diseases. This practice offers numerous benefits by allowing maximum utilization of space and mutual adaptation of associated species. It is important to emphasize that crop association is oriented towards the mutual advantage of the species involved, thus guaranteeing favorable results for each of them. In this sense, the behavior of maize growth rates was evaluated in a completely randomized block design with four treatments: maize monoculture; maize and peanut association; maize and cassava association; and maize, peanut, and cassava association. The following variables were evaluated: net assimilation rate (NAR), leaf area index (LAI), relative growth rate (RGR), leaf area ratio (LAR), absolute growth rate (AGR), and leaf area duration (LAD). The association of maize and cassava obtained the highest values NAR (0.002 g cm-2 d-1) and RGR (0.15 g g-1 d-1) compared to the monoculture (0.001 g cm-2 d-1 and 0.08 g g-1 d-1). This happened because maize presented higher leaf production during the vegetative growth stage indicating the physiological efficiency of maize when associated with cassava.
Publisher
Universidad Nacional de Colombia
Subject
Agronomy and Crop Science
Reference53 articles.
1. Abbas, A., Ullah, F., Hafeez, M., Han, X., Dara, M. Z. N., Gul, H., & Zhao, C. R. (2022). Biological control of fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda. Agronomy, 12(11), Article 2704. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12112704 2. Aguilar-Carpio, C., Escalante Estrada, J. A. S., & Aguilar Mariscal, I. (2015). Análisis de crecimiento y rendimiento de maíz en clima cálido en función del genotipo, biofertilizante y nitrógeno. Terra Latinoamericana, 33(1), 51–62. 3. Aguilar-García, L., Escalante-Estrada, J. A., Fucikovsky-Zak, L., Tijerina-Chávez, L., & Mark Engleman, E. (2005). Área foliar, tasa de asimilación neta, rendimiento y densidad de población en girasol. Terra Latinoamericana, 23(3), 303–310. 4. Aldana García, J., Correa Múnera, M. A., & Álvarez Dávila, E. (2021). Árboles de la estación de monitoreo de biodiversidad en el centro de investigaciones macagual (Florencia-Caquetá). Brazilian Journal of Animal and Environmental Research, 4(3), 3575–3592. https://doi.org/10.34188/bjaerv4n3-064 5. Almanza-Merchán, P. J., Tovar-León, Y. P., & Velandia-Díaz, J. D. (2016). Comportamiento de la biomasa y de las tasas de crecimiento de dos variedades de lulo (Solanum quitoense Lam.) en Pachavita, Boyacá. Ciencia y Agricultura, 13(1), 67–76.
|
|