Ensemble Kalman Filter for Hourly Streamflow Forecasting in Huaynamota River, Nayarit, México
-
Published:2022-07-14
Issue:3
Volume:42
Page:e90023
-
ISSN:2248-8723
-
Container-title:Ingeniería e Investigación
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:Ing. Inv.
Author:
Nárvaez-Ortiz IldefonsoORCID, Ibáñez-Castillo Laura AliciaORCID, Arteaga-Ramírez RamónORCID, Vázquez-Peña Mario AlbertoORCID
Abstract
Hydrological phenomena are characterized by the formation of a non-linear dynamic system, and streamflows are not unrelated to this premise. Data assimilation offers an alternative for flow forecasting using the Ensemble Kalman Filter, given its relative ease of implementation and lower computational effort in comparison with other techniques. The hourly streamflow of the Chapalagana station was forecasted based on that of the Platanitos station in northwestern México. The forecasts were made from one to six steps forward, combined with set sizes of 5, 10, 20, 30, 50, and 100 members. The Nash-Sutcliffe coefficients of the Discrete Kalman filter were 0,99 and 0,85 for steps one and six, respectively, achieving the best fit with a tendency to shift the predicted series, similar to the persistent forecast. The Ensemble Kalman Filter (EnKF) obtained 0,99 and 0,05 in steps one and six. However, it converges on the observed series with the limitation of considerable overestimation in higher steps. All three algorithms have equal statistical adjustment values in step one, and there are progressive differences in further steps, where ARX and DKF remain similar and EnKF is differentiated by the overestimation. EnKF enables capturing non-linearity in sudden streamflow changes but generates overestimation at the peaks.
Publisher
Universidad Nacional de Colombia
Subject
General Engineering,Building and Construction
Reference42 articles.
1. Abaza, M., Anctil, F., Fortin, V., and Turcotte, R. (2015). Exploration of sequential streamflow assimilation in snow dominated watersheds. Advances in Water Resources, 86, 414-424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2015.10.008 2. Aguado-Rodríguez, J., Quevedo-Nolasco, A., Castro-Popoca, M., Arteaga-Ramírez, R., Vázquez-Peña, M., and Zamora- Morales, P. (2016). Predicción de variables meteorológicas por medio de modelos ARIMA. Agrociencia, 50(1). http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1405-31952016000100001 3. Alvarado-Hernández, L., Ibáñez-Castillo, L., Ruiz-García, A., González-Leiva, F., and Vázquez-Peña, M. (2020). Pronóstico horario de caudales mediante filtro de kalman discreto en el Río Huaynamota, Nayarit, México. Agrociencia, 54, 295-312. https://doi.org/10.47163/agrociencia.v54i3.1907 4. Bai, L., Chen, Z., Xu, J., and Li, W. (2016). Multi-scale response of runoff to climate fluctuation in the headwater region of Kaidu River in Xinjiang of China. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 125(3-4), 703-712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-015-1539-2 5. Box, G., Jenkins, G., Reinsel, G., and Ljung, G. (2016). Time series analysis: Forecasting and control (5th ed.). Wiley.
|
|