1. J.P. Ioannidis, Why most published research findings are false, PLoS Med, 2 (2005) 124.
2. Nobe_laureate_Tasuku_Honjo, 90% of the opinions of the top journals of CNS are incorrect, in, https://dataverse.harvard.edu/file.xhtml?fileId=5112613&version=1.1#.
3. S. Vazire, A toast to the error detectors, "Last month, I got a private Twitter message from a postdoc bruised by the clash between science as it is and how it should be. He had published a commentary in which he pointed out errors in a famous researcher’s paper. The critique was accurate, important and measured — a service to his field. But it caused him problems: his adviser told him that publishing the criticism had crossed a line, and he should never do it again.", Nature, 577 (2020) 9.
4. M. Planck, Scientific Autobiography and Other Paper, William & Norgate, London, pp. 33 - 34, "A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it.", 1950.
5. Z. Zhao, Y. Qing, L. Kong, H. Xu, X. Fan, J. Yun, L. Zhang, H. Wu, Advancements in Microwave Absorption Motivated by Interdisciplinary Research, Advanced Materials, 36 (2024) 2304182