Abstract
The present paper explores the lexical profiles of monolingual and bilingual learners acquiring English as a second and third language, respectively. Those profiles allow to get insights into learners’ lexical access and lexical organization in the new language. To shed more light in this issue, a lexical fluency task was used to gather data. Results showed lack of significant differences in all the measures taken, but some very interesting differences appear when graph theory metrics are applied. Thus, educational bilinguals show higher levels of lexical organization and stronger connections among the nodes. This can be indicative of a mental lexicon which is better organized, more compact, and more stable. Additionally, educational bilinguals’ networks display highest clustering coefficient and shortest path length. In semantic terms, this means that educational bilinguals can navigate their lexicon more efficiently and in a way that better resembles native lexical search. These findings open up new avenues for insightful studies concerning lexicon organization in different types of learners, with bilingualism being a relevant modulating factor.
Funder
Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades
Publisher
Universitat Politecnica de Valencia
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Reference70 articles.
1. Ávila Muñoz, A.M. & Sánchez Sáez, J.M. (2011). La posición de los vocablos en el cálculo del índice de disponibilidad léxica. Procesos de reentrada en las listas del léxico disponible de la ciudad de Málaga [online]. Estudios de Lingüística de la Universidad de Alicante, 25, 45-74. https://doi.org/10.14198/ELUA2011.25.02
2. Balke-Aurell, G., & Linblad, T. (1982). Immigrant children and their languages. Department of Education Research, University of Gothenburg.
3. Bardel, C., & C. Lindqvist. (2007). The role of proficiency and psychotypology in lexical crosslinguistic influence. A study of a multilingual learner of Italian L3. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference of the Italian Association of Applied Linguistics, Napels.
4. Beckage, N.M., & Colunga, E. (2015). Language networks as models of cognition: Understanding cognition through language. Towards a theoretical framework for analyzing complex linguistic networks (pp. 3-28). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47238-5_1
5. Berthele, R., & Udry, I. (2019). Multilingual boost vs. Cognitive abilities: Testing two theories of multilingual language learning in a primary school context. International Journal of Multilingualism, 19(1), 142-161. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2019.1632315
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献