Affiliation:
1. Duke University , Durham , USA
2. Trinity College , Hartford , USA
Abstract
Abstract
Less than 1 year after President Biden announced a sweeping plan to reduce – and in many cases eliminate – the student loan burden for the 46 million Americans who hold educational debt, the Supreme Court ruled the proposal unconstitutional in Biden v. Nebraska. Media accounts immediately speculated about whether the Court’s actions would spell trouble for the President’s reelection efforts, presuming that voters would punish Biden for a perceived policy failure. Despite, or perhaps because of, these concerns, the administration has continued to pursue student debt forgiveness through other means, and highlighting these efforts has been a key component of the president’s re-election strategy. Prior research suggests that Democrats, and the president in particular, stand to benefit electorally from pursuing student debt relief. But did the Supreme Court’s decision to block the president’s plan change who voters hold accountable for the problem of student loan debt? And to what extent is the issue motivating voters from different constituencies in 2024? This study leverages insights from an original survey experiment fielded in August 2023 to explore the dynamics of blame attribution for federal student debt cancellation efforts. We find that, contrary to media speculation, voters place much greater blame on the Supreme Court and congressional Republicans for the problem of student debt, while President Biden receives relatively little blame. We consider the implications of these findings for the short-term electoral politics of student debt relief policy as well as the increasingly salient politics of debt relief more broadly.
Reference65 articles.
1. Ajzen, Icek. 1991. “The Theory of Planned Behavior.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50 (2): 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t.
2. Ajzen, Icek, and Martin Fishbein. 1980. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood: Prentice-Hall.
3. Arnold, R. Douglas. 1990. The Logic of Congressional Action. New Haven: Yale University Press.
4. Baumgartner, Frank R., and Bryan D. Jones. 2009. Agendas and Instability in American Politics, 2nd ed.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5. Binkley, Collin. 2018. “Obama-Era Rule Leads to $150M in Student Loan Forgiveness.” Chicago Sun Times. https://chicago.suntimes.com/2018/12/14/18430550/obama-era-rule-leads-to-150m-in-student-loan-forgiveness (accessed May 1, 2024).